MedElevator
Войти в исследования American heart journal · 2025
Structural abnormalities and effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction and worsening heart failure: The PARAGLIDE-HF trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kittipibul Veraprapas, Cyr Derek D, Harrington Josephine, Lala Anuradha, Fudim Marat, Ward Jonathan H, Sarwat Samiha, Solomon Scott D, Hernandez Adrian F, Zieroth Shelley, Starling Randall C, Mentz Robert J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: PARAGLIDE-HF showed significantly greater reduction in NT-proBNP in patients with LVEF>40% and worsening HF with sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) vs valsartan (val). The impact of structural abnormalities on the effects of sac/val in this context is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left atrial enlargement (LAE) on sac/val in patients with LVEF>40% and worsening HF.
METHODS: PARAGLIDE-HF patients were classified into 3 groups according the degree of structural abnormalities using LVH and LAE. The primary endpoint was time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline to Weeks 4 and 8. Secondary endpoints were recurrent cardiovascular composite events (HF hospitalizations, urgent HF visits, cardiovascular death) and adverse events (symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalemia, worsening renal function).
RESULTS: Of 454 (97.4%) patients with LVH and LAE data, 157 (34.5%) had both LVH and LAE, 178 (39.2%) had either LVH or LAE, and 119 (26.2%) had neither LVH nor LAE. Greater reduction in NT-proBNP with sac/val vs val was consistent across groups (P interaction = 0.705). There was no significant interaction between treatment and degree of structural abnormalities for other efficacy endpoints. Patients with both LVH and LAE had significantly higher odds of hyperkalemia with sac/val (OR 2.41, P interaction = 0.024).
CONCLUSION: Patients with LVEF>40% and recent WHF had greater reduction in NT-proBNP with sac/val vs val, regardless of the degree of structural abnormalities. There was no difference in the effects of sac/val on efficacy endpoints across structural abnormality group. Patients with both LVH and LAE had higher odds for hyperkalemia with sac/val.
METHODS: PARAGLIDE-HF patients were classified into 3 groups according the degree of structural abnormalities using LVH and LAE. The primary endpoint was time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline to Weeks 4 and 8. Secondary endpoints were recurrent cardiovascular composite events (HF hospitalizations, urgent HF visits, cardiovascular death) and adverse events (symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalemia, worsening renal function).
RESULTS: Of 454 (97.4%) patients with LVH and LAE data, 157 (34.5%) had both LVH and LAE, 178 (39.2%) had either LVH or LAE, and 119 (26.2%) had neither LVH nor LAE. Greater reduction in NT-proBNP with sac/val vs val was consistent across groups (P interaction = 0.705). There was no significant interaction between treatment and degree of structural abnormalities for other efficacy endpoints. Patients with both LVH and LAE had significantly higher odds of hyperkalemia with sac/val (OR 2.41, P interaction = 0.024).
CONCLUSION: Patients with LVEF>40% and recent WHF had greater reduction in NT-proBNP with sac/val vs val, regardless of the degree of structural abnormalities. There was no difference in the effects of sac/val on efficacy endpoints across structural abnormality group. Patients with both LVH and LAE had higher odds for hyperkalemia with sac/val.