MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1993.tb01282.x

Медицинская библиотека · Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses · 1993

A comparison of open and closed catheterization techniques in rehabilitation patients.

Quigley P A, Riggin O Z

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

An effective method was sought to decrease the incidence of urinary tract infections acquired by hospitalized rehabilitation patients requiring catheterization. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in the incidence of urinary tract infections that occurred following use of two types of intermittent catheterization techniques: open catheterization and closed catheterization. The incidence of infection in both the control (open catheterization) and experimental (closed catheterization) groups was analyzed. In the control group, 9 of 14 patients (5 stroke, 4 spinal cord injured [SCI]) completed all four urine tests. Two patients developed a 20,000 colony count of enterococcus on the fourth urine sample using open catheterization. In the experimental group, 11 (4 stroke, 7 SCI) out of 16 patients maintained colony counts below 100,000 organisms per ml; one patient had a 16,000 colony count using closed catheterization. Qualitative data revealed that patients had a positive response to the closed system.

Для цитирования: Quigley P A, Riggin O Z. A comparison of open and closed catheterization techniques in rehabilitation patients.. Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses. 1993. DOI: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1993.tb01282.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.