MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370250065013

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 1979

Prosthetic aortic valves. Indications for and results of reoperation.

Shemin R J, Guadiani V A, Conkle D M, Morrow A G

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

During a 15-year period from January 1962 through December 1976, 42 patients who had undergone a previous aortic valve replacement underwent reoperation. The mean interval between operations was 4.4 years. The indications for reoperation were aortic regurgitation resulting from mechanical malfunction (12 patients), ball variance (15 patients), perivalvular leaks (five patients), prosthetic stenosis (eight patients), anemia (one patient), and recurrent emboli (one patient). The indications were characteristic of a specific valve series. The most common reoperation was aortic valve replacement (29/42), which had a 10.3% operative mortality. Poppet change (10/42) carried a 10% operative mortality and no operative deaths followed suture closure of perivalvular leaks. Eighty-eight percent of patients alive six months after reoperation were New York Heart Association functional class 1 or 2. At last follow-up, 95% of surviving patients were still functional class 1 or 2, with a mean cumulative survival of 4.7 years after reoperation. This experience demonstrates that those patients surviving long enough to undergo reoperation can expect a reasonable operative risk, long-term survival, and excellent clinical improvement.

Для цитирования: Shemin R J, Guadiani V A, Conkle D M, Morrow A G. Prosthetic aortic valves. Indications for and results of reoperation.. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 1979. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370250065013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.