MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/cre2.862

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024

Intracanal microbiome profiles of two apical periodontitis cases in one patient: A comparison with saliva and plaque profiles.

Yamaki Keiko, Tamahara Toru, Washio Jumpei, Sato Takuichi, Shimizu Ritsuko, Yamada Satoru

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine the characteristics of the endodontic microbiome.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Saliva, plaque, and infected root canal wall dentin of two teeth suffering from apical periodontitis were harvested from a 58-year-old man. Bacterial DNA was extracted from each sample, and 16S rRNA gene analysis targeting the V3-V4 region was conducted on the Illumina MiSeq platform using QIIME2. The functional potential of the microbiomes was inferred using PICRUSt2.

RESULTS

The four microbiomes were different in structure and membership, yet the nine most abundant metabolic pathways were common among them. The two endodontic microbiomes were more anaerobic, rich in Firmicutes, and scarce in Actinobacteriota and Proteobacteria, compared with saliva and plaque microbiomes. Their profiles were dissimilar despite their clinical and radiographic similarities.

CONCLUSIONS

The endodontic microbiomes were anaerobic, rich in Firmicutes, scarce in Actinobacteriota and Proteobacteria, and considerably varied within an individual.

Для цитирования: Yamaki Keiko, Tamahara Toru, Washio Jumpei, Sato Takuichi, Shimizu Ritsuko, Yamada Satoru. Intracanal microbiome profiles of two apical periodontitis cases in one patient: A comparison with saliva and plaque profiles.. Clinical and experimental dental research. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.862.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.