Histopathology · 2015
The role of CD5 expression in thymic carcinoma: possible mechanism for interaction with CD5+ lymphoid stroma (microenvironment).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hosaka Naoki, Ohe Chisato, Miyasaka Chika, Nakano Yorika, Sakaida Noriko, Uemura Yoshiko, Saito Yukihito, Ikehara Susumu, Tsubura Airo, Takahashi Hakuo
Аннотация
AIMS: Most thymic carcinomas express the lymphocyte marker CD5 aberrantly. This study was performed to examine the role of the self-reactive CD5 antigen in thymic carcinoma.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined CD5 expression in thymic carcinoma in relation to the lymphoid stroma. All cases of thymic carcinoma examined expressed CD5. A number of CD5(+) lymphocytes were also present in the stroma of thymic carcinoma. The CD5(+) tumour areas were predominantly in contact with the lymphoid stroma, and the expression level was significantly lower in tumour cells than lymphocytes. Although p53 and Bcl-2 expression levels were significantly higher in thymic carcinoma than normal thymic epithelial cells (TECs), they did not differ between CD5(+) and CD5(-) areas. E-cadherin expression in thymic carcinoma was comparable with that of normal TECs, and it also did not differ between these areas. In contrast, both Ki-67 index and mitotic activity were significantly higher in thymic carcinoma than normal TECs, and they were significantly higher in CD5(+) than CD5(-) areas.
CONCLUSIONS: CD5 may be induced by interaction with CD5(+) lymphoid stroma, and may be related to tumour proliferation. CD5 induction may also be a significant and/or specific effect of the tumour microenvironment of the thymus.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined CD5 expression in thymic carcinoma in relation to the lymphoid stroma. All cases of thymic carcinoma examined expressed CD5. A number of CD5(+) lymphocytes were also present in the stroma of thymic carcinoma. The CD5(+) tumour areas were predominantly in contact with the lymphoid stroma, and the expression level was significantly lower in tumour cells than lymphocytes. Although p53 and Bcl-2 expression levels were significantly higher in thymic carcinoma than normal thymic epithelial cells (TECs), they did not differ between CD5(+) and CD5(-) areas. E-cadherin expression in thymic carcinoma was comparable with that of normal TECs, and it also did not differ between these areas. In contrast, both Ki-67 index and mitotic activity were significantly higher in thymic carcinoma than normal TECs, and they were significantly higher in CD5(+) than CD5(-) areas.
CONCLUSIONS: CD5 may be induced by interaction with CD5(+) lymphoid stroma, and may be related to tumour proliferation. CD5 induction may also be a significant and/or specific effect of the tumour microenvironment of the thymus.