DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2025.03.031
Are Women Urologists Caring for Predominantly Women Patient Populations? Exploring the Role of Patient-Physician Gender Concordance in Robotic and Laparoscopic Urological Surgery.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate gender proportions in women versus men urologists' patient populations as well as within subspecialties to further understand women urologists' practice patterns and workforce impact in the field of urology.
METHODS
This retrospective study analyzed American Board of Urology case logs of robotic and laparoscopic surgeries from 2012 to 2022. Cases were grouped by women and men urologists and further sub-analyzed by physician subspecialty. Comparison of patient gender was performed using Fisher's Exact test and Chi-squared test.
RESULTS
Women urologists performed 7.2% of robotic and laparoscopic surgeries cases, with the highest proportion of cases by women surgeons in female urology (36.9%) and pediatric urology (23.8%). Other subspecialties had 5% or less of the cases performed by women. Women urologist's patient population was 54.3% women patients, as compared to 23.5% of that of men providers (P <.001).
CONCLUSION
The higher percentage of women in the patient population of women urologists likely has a multifactorial explanation (eg, patient preference, referral practice patterns, physician preference, gender bias). These practice patterns may limit opportunity for women urologists to exercise the full scope of their surgical training while also limiting the ability of male urologists to provide full-service care to women patients. Further research is needed to explore barriers to entry for women within urologic subspecialties that may affect types of patients seen to ensure equity for women urologists within the field and to optimize patient outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.