MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.23736/s0026-4784.16.03920-4

Медицинская библиотека · Minerva ginecologica · 2016

Undescended or absent ovary without uterine anomalies: systematic review and a single center's experience.

Luvero Daniela, Plotti Francesco, Capriglione Stella, Miranda Andrea, Lopez Salvatore, Scaletta Giuseppe, Dell'anna Arianna, Angioli Roberto

Клинический случайСтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Two cases of unilateral adnexal absence and ectopic ovarian hypoplasia with fallopian tube absence are herein reported, along with a systematic review of the literature and a discussion on the main factors causing these malformations.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The MEDLINE database was searched for English language medical reports published between 1973 and 2014. The key words used were "ovarian agenesis", "ovarian hypoplasia", "undescended ovary" and "fallopian tube abnormalities".

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Five studies were included on unilateral ovarian maldescent without uterine anomalies, along with 23 reports of unilateral absence of one ovary in presence or absence of the fallopian tube.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though of Müllerian duct anomalies are relatively common, congenital defects or absence of an ovary is quite rare. It would be interesting to investigate and to correlate the presence of such rare anomalies with the percentage of pregnancies. Therefore, further evaluation and larger studies are needed.

Для цитирования: Luvero Daniela, Plotti Francesco, Capriglione Stella, Miranda Andrea, Lopez Salvatore, Scaletta Giuseppe, Dell'anna Arianna, Angioli Roberto. Undescended or absent ovary without uterine anomalies: systematic review and a single center's experience.. Minerva ginecologica. 2016. DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4784.16.03920-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.