One-Year Comparative Outcomes of Conventional Versus Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking in Progressive Keratoconus.

Background and

Objectives

Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) halts keratoconus progression, yet potential differences between conventional and accelerated protocols at one year remain uncertain. We analyzed the completed 12-month follow-up of a previously reported 6-month cohort to compare conventional (3 mW/cm2 × 30 min; CXL 30) versus accelerated (9 mW/cm2 × 10 min; CXL 10) CXL, interpreting outcomes within the ABCD framework alongside Kmax and curvature radii. Materials and

Methods

In this single-center retrospective longitudinal analysis of prospectively collected routine clinical data, 22 eyes were included, with assessments performed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. Evaluated outcomes comprised ABCD stages (A-D), anterior and posterior radius of curvature (ARC and PRC), Kmax, pachymetric and elevation indices, as well as UDVA and BCVA. Within-group change used Friedman with Wilcoxon post hoc; between-group differences used Mann-Whitney (α = 0.05).

Results

Both protocols resulted in significant visual improvement and Kmax reduction at 12 months (overall time effect: CXL 30 p < 0.001; CXL 10 p = 0.026). Median Kmax decreased 56.5 → 52.3 D (CXL 30) and 59.3 → 58.3 D (CXL 10). UDVA improved 0.2 → 0.6 (CXL 30) and 0.2 → 0.3 (CXL 10); BCVA 0.4 → 0.8 (CXL 30) and 0.2 → 0.5 (CXL 10). Tomographic analysis showed predominantly anterior changes, with a significant decrease in A stage in the CXL 30 group and an increase in ARC in both groups, more pronounced in CXL 30. In the late 6 → 12-month window, posterior metrics (PRC and posterior elevation) were largely stable; raw PRC change did not reach significance.

Conclusions

Conventional and accelerated CXL both stabilized keratoconus at one year with meaningful functional gains. Beyond 6 months, remodeling was predominantly anterior; within-group findings suggested a more pronounced anterior tomographic response in the CXL 30 group. The 12-month visit may be useful for reassessing stability after CXL, although this study was not designed to determine optimal retreatment timing or optical rehabilitation strategy. Longer-term studies with standardized biomechanical and densitometric endpoints are warranted to assess durability and refine protocol selection.