MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/pcn.12614

Медицинская библиотека · Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2017

Short- and long-term evaluation of cognitive functions after electroconvulsive therapy in a Japanese population.

Takagi Shunsuke, Takeuchi Takashi, Yamamoto Naoki, Fujita Munehisa, Furuta Ko, Ishikawa Hiroyo, Motohashi Nobutaka, Nishikawa Toru

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: While electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a well-established, safe, and effective treatment for mental illnesses, the potential for adverse effects on cognitive functions remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate multiple cognitive functions in different time periods before and after ECT in a Japanese population.

METHODS

A battery of five neurocognitive tests was administered to patients who underwent a course of ECT treatment at three time points: before, immediately after, and 4 weeks after ECT.

RESULTS

A transient but significant decline in letter fluency function was observed immediately after ECT, but had recovered well by 4 weeks. We also observed a significant improvement in the trail-making task at 4 weeks after ECT.

CONCLUSION

In a Japanese population, adverse effects of ECT on verbal fluency function-related and other cognitive impairments were transient. Over the longer term, we detected significant improvements in the performance of tasks that presumably reflected information processing speed and executive functions.

Для цитирования: Takagi Shunsuke, Takeuchi Takashi, Yamamoto Naoki, Fujita Munehisa, Furuta Ko, Ishikawa Hiroyo, Motohashi Nobutaka, Nishikawa Toru. Short- and long-term evaluation of cognitive functions after electroconvulsive therapy in a Japanese population.. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences. 2017. DOI: 10.1111/pcn.12614.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.