Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2018
Ascitic cholesterol is superior to serum-ascites albumin gradient in the detection of non-portal hypertensive ascites and the diagnosis of mixed ascites.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Du Li, Zhu Shenghua, Lu Zhiwen, Xu Ting, Bai Tao, Xu Dong, Wei Xiuqi, Li Jin, Xu Keshu, Ye Jin, Hou Xiaohua, Song Yuhu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of ascitic cholesterol in the differential diagnosis of ascites is controversial.
AIM: To investigate the diagnostic performance of ascitic cholesterol in the differential diagnosis of ascites.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with new-onset ascites were enrolled prospectively. The pertinent data were collected from 629 patients with all forms of ascites.
RESULTS: In the training cohort, determination of the ascitic cholesterol level was a highly effective method of distinguishing non-portal hypertension (NPH) from portal hypertension (PH). At the pre-determined cut-off value of 45 mg/dL, the sensitivity of ascitic cholesterol was superior to the serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) in identifying NPH-related ascites; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.945. In the patients misdiagnosed based on SAAG classification, the diagnostic accuracy of ascitic cholesterol was 69%. The ascitic cholesterol level showed excellent performance in identifying peritoneal lesions in patients with mixed ascites.
CONCLUSION: Ascitic cholesterol is an excellent measure for detecting NPH ascites and for identifying peritoneal lesions in mixed ascites. Thus, this simple and cost-effective measure should be determined in patients with new-onset ascites (www.chictr.org.cn; ChiCTR-DCD-15006907).
AIM: To investigate the diagnostic performance of ascitic cholesterol in the differential diagnosis of ascites.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with new-onset ascites were enrolled prospectively. The pertinent data were collected from 629 patients with all forms of ascites.
RESULTS: In the training cohort, determination of the ascitic cholesterol level was a highly effective method of distinguishing non-portal hypertension (NPH) from portal hypertension (PH). At the pre-determined cut-off value of 45 mg/dL, the sensitivity of ascitic cholesterol was superior to the serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) in identifying NPH-related ascites; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.945. In the patients misdiagnosed based on SAAG classification, the diagnostic accuracy of ascitic cholesterol was 69%. The ascitic cholesterol level showed excellent performance in identifying peritoneal lesions in patients with mixed ascites.
CONCLUSION: Ascitic cholesterol is an excellent measure for detecting NPH ascites and for identifying peritoneal lesions in mixed ascites. Thus, this simple and cost-effective measure should be determined in patients with new-onset ascites (www.chictr.org.cn; ChiCTR-DCD-15006907).