Virtual-Reality Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Transseptal Puncture in a Cardiac Phantom.

OBJECTIVES

We compared virtual-reality guided versus fluoroscopy-guided transseptal puncture by novice and experienced operators in a cardiac phantom. Outcome measures included accuracy, time, transseptal path distance, and a survey of the operator experience.

METHODS

A transseptal simulator was created using a Plexiglas case and a 3D-printed cardiac phantom with a replaceable fossa ovalis, a customized support, and an electromagnetic tracking system. A precisely registered virtual-reality rendering was constructed. To display the transseptal instruments in virtual reality, we attached electromagnetic sensors to standard transseptal instruments, including the needle, dilator, and sheath. Each subject completed 6 simulated transseptal punctures (3 fluoroscopy-guided and 3 virtual-reality guided). We measured the distance traversed by the transseptal needle, accuracy, and time for each simulated transseptal puncture. Operators were then surveyed regarding their experience.

RESULTS

A total of 8 subjects (6 faculty, 2 fellows) completed the trial. We found that virtual-reality guidance resulted in significantly more accurate puncture site selection and, subjectively, was more intuitive for the operator, particularly for novices. None of the participants experienced negative symptoms in virtual reality that required cessation of the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual reality compared with fluoroscopic guidance for transseptal puncture shows considerable promise, particularly for novice trainees, where it could lessen the learning curve. Current barriers to widespread implementation are discussed.