European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
Targeted α-therapy using astatine (211At)-labeled PSMA1, 5, and 6: a preclinical evaluation as a novel compound.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Watabe Tadashi, Kaneda-Nakashima Kazuko, Shirakami Yoshifumi, Kadonaga Yuichiro, Ooe Kazuhiro, Wang Yang, Haba Hiromitsu, Toyoshima Atsushi, Cardinale Jens, Giesel Frederik L, Tomiyama Noriyuki, Fukase Koichi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Targeted α-therapy (TAT) for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Astatine is an α-emitter (half-life=7.2 h) that can be produced by a 30-MeV cyclotron. This study evaluated the treatment effect of 211At-labeled PSMA compounds in mouse xenograft models.
METHODS: Tumor xenograft models were established by subcutaneous transplantation of human prostate cancer cells (LNCaP) in NOD/SCID mouse. [211At]PSMA1, [211At]PSMA5, or [211At]PSMA6 was administered to LNCaP xenograft mice to evaluate biodistribution at 3 and 24 h. The treatment effect was evaluated by administering [211At]PSMA1 (0.40 ± 0.07 MBq), [211At]PSMA5 (0.39 ± 0.03 MBq), or saline. Histopathological evaluation was performed for the at-risk organs at 3 and 6 weeks after administration.
RESULTS: [211At]PSMA5 resulted in higher tumor retention compared to [211At]PSMA1 and [211At]PSMA6 (30.6 ± 17.8, 12.4 ± 4.8, and 19.1 ± 4.5 %ID/g at 3 h versus 40.7 ± 2.6, 8.7 ± 3.5, and 18.1 ± 2.2%ID/g at 24 h, respectively), whereas kidney excretion was superior in [211At]PSMA1 compared to [211At]PSMA5 and [211At]PSMA6. An excellent treatment effect on tumor growth was observed after [211At]PSMA5 administration. [211At]PSMA1 also showed a substantial treatment effect; however, the tumor size was relatively larger compared to that with [211At]PSMA5. In the histopathological evaluation, regenerated tubules were detected in the kidneys at 3 and 6 weeks after the administration of [211At]PSMA5.
CONCLUSION: TAT using [211At]PSMA5 resulted in excellent tumor growth suppression with minimal side effects in the normal organs. [211At]PSMA5 should be considered a new possible TAT for metastatic CRPC, and translational prospective trials are warranted.
METHODS: Tumor xenograft models were established by subcutaneous transplantation of human prostate cancer cells (LNCaP) in NOD/SCID mouse. [211At]PSMA1, [211At]PSMA5, or [211At]PSMA6 was administered to LNCaP xenograft mice to evaluate biodistribution at 3 and 24 h. The treatment effect was evaluated by administering [211At]PSMA1 (0.40 ± 0.07 MBq), [211At]PSMA5 (0.39 ± 0.03 MBq), or saline. Histopathological evaluation was performed for the at-risk organs at 3 and 6 weeks after administration.
RESULTS: [211At]PSMA5 resulted in higher tumor retention compared to [211At]PSMA1 and [211At]PSMA6 (30.6 ± 17.8, 12.4 ± 4.8, and 19.1 ± 4.5 %ID/g at 3 h versus 40.7 ± 2.6, 8.7 ± 3.5, and 18.1 ± 2.2%ID/g at 24 h, respectively), whereas kidney excretion was superior in [211At]PSMA1 compared to [211At]PSMA5 and [211At]PSMA6. An excellent treatment effect on tumor growth was observed after [211At]PSMA5 administration. [211At]PSMA1 also showed a substantial treatment effect; however, the tumor size was relatively larger compared to that with [211At]PSMA5. In the histopathological evaluation, regenerated tubules were detected in the kidneys at 3 and 6 weeks after the administration of [211At]PSMA5.
CONCLUSION: TAT using [211At]PSMA5 resulted in excellent tumor growth suppression with minimal side effects in the normal organs. [211At]PSMA5 should be considered a new possible TAT for metastatic CRPC, and translational prospective trials are warranted.