Lymph drainage and cervical fascia anatomy-oriented differential nodal CTV delineation at the supraclavicular region for esophageal cancer and nasopharyngeal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the differences in supraclavicular lymph node metastasis between esophageal cancer (EC) and nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and explore the feasibility of differential supraclavicular clinical target volume (CTV) contouring between these two diseases based on the involvement of different fascial spaces.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

One hundred patients with supraclavicular nodes positive for EC or NPC were enrolled, and their pre-treatment images were reviewed. The distribution patterns of nodes between the two diseases were compared in the context of node levels defined by the 2017 Japanese Esophageal Society and 2013 International Consensus on Cervical Lymph Node Level Classification. Grouping supraclavicular nodes based on sub-compartments formed by the cervical fascia was discussed, and the feasibility of differential CTV contouring based on the differences in the involvement of these sub-compartments between EC and NPC was explored.

RESULTS

The 2013 Consensus on cervical node levels and 2017 Japanese Esophageal Society node station could not practically guide supraclavicular CTV contouring. We divided the supraclavicular space into six sub-compartments: the para-esophageal space (PES), carotid sheath space (CSS), sub-thyroid pre-trachea space (STPTS), pre-vascular space (PVS), and vascular lateral space (VLS) I and II. EC mainly spread to the PES, STPTS, CSS, and VLS I, whereas NPC tended to spread to the CSS, VLS I, and VLS II. These combinations of sub-compartments may help constitute the supraclavicular CTVs for EC and NPC.

CONCLUSIONS

The fascia anatomy-based sub-compartments sufficiently distinguished metastasis to the supraclavicular space between EC and NPC, thus facilitating differential CTV contouring between these two diseases.