European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
Harmonizing Aβ deposition threshold for 18F-florbetaben PET imaging: Addressing discrepancies and calibration between PET/CT and PET/MRI.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lin Huamei, Jiang Quanling, Yang Yunhao, Huang Qi, Zhang Ying, Zhang Zhengwei, Zhu Yuhua, Lu Jiaying, Wang Jing, Wang Min, Men Jianwei, Yang Yufeng, Zhang Huiwei, Guan Yihui, Ge Jingjie, Lu Jie, Jiang Jiehui, Zuo Chuantao
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Discrepancies between PET/CT and PET/MRI scanners can affect the determination of amyloid beta (Aβ) deposition thresholds in patients with cognitive impairment. This study aimed to identify these differences and propose a calibration method to standardize Aβ quantification across imaging modalities.
METHODS: A total of 133 patients with cognitive impairment underwent Aβ PET imaging and were divided into four groups: a head-to-head PET/CT and PET/MRI cohort (group A, n = 6), an independent PET/CT cohort (group B, n = 48), an independent PET/MRI cohort (group C, n = 79), and another independent PET/MRI cohort (group D, n = 10). Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) of global cortical target (CTXsuvr) and centiloid (CL) values were compared within group A and between groups B and C. A whole cerebellum (WC)-referenced SUVR method was used to calibrate CL values in group C, with verification in group D.
RESULTS: CTXsuvr values were significantly higher in PET/MRI than in PET/CT in both group A (P < 0.05) and group C versus group B (P < 0.001). Aβ-negative/positive cases showed mean ± variance of CTXsuvr as 1.023 ± 0.104/1.479 ± 0.203 in group B and 1.146 ± 0.100/1.743 ± 0.254 in group C, with cutoffs of 1.140 (CL = 20) and 1.401 (CL = 60), respectively. WC-referenced calibration adjusted PET/MRI cutoff to 1.132 (CL = 19) in group C, aligning it with PET/CT thresholds and validated in group D.
CONCLUSION: WC-referenced SUVR calibration effectively mitigates differences in Aβ thresholds between PET/CT and PET/MRI, enhancing Aβ quantification standardization in multi-modal imaging.
METHODS: A total of 133 patients with cognitive impairment underwent Aβ PET imaging and were divided into four groups: a head-to-head PET/CT and PET/MRI cohort (group A, n = 6), an independent PET/CT cohort (group B, n = 48), an independent PET/MRI cohort (group C, n = 79), and another independent PET/MRI cohort (group D, n = 10). Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) of global cortical target (CTXsuvr) and centiloid (CL) values were compared within group A and between groups B and C. A whole cerebellum (WC)-referenced SUVR method was used to calibrate CL values in group C, with verification in group D.
RESULTS: CTXsuvr values were significantly higher in PET/MRI than in PET/CT in both group A (P < 0.05) and group C versus group B (P < 0.001). Aβ-negative/positive cases showed mean ± variance of CTXsuvr as 1.023 ± 0.104/1.479 ± 0.203 in group B and 1.146 ± 0.100/1.743 ± 0.254 in group C, with cutoffs of 1.140 (CL = 20) and 1.401 (CL = 60), respectively. WC-referenced calibration adjusted PET/MRI cutoff to 1.132 (CL = 19) in group C, aligning it with PET/CT thresholds and validated in group D.
CONCLUSION: WC-referenced SUVR calibration effectively mitigates differences in Aβ thresholds between PET/CT and PET/MRI, enhancing Aβ quantification standardization in multi-modal imaging.