Australian and New Zealand journal of public health · 2020
Preventing and controlling Cryptosporidium spp. in aquatic facilities: environmental health practitioners' experiences in Victoria, Australia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cullinan Lauren, McLean Sarah, Dunn Louise
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers and enablers to preventing and controlling Cryptosporidium spp. in aquatic facilities as perceived by environmental health practitioners (EHPs).
METHODS: A qualitative, constructivist study with a purposive sample of seven EHPs from Victoria, Australia, was conducted. A focus group discussion was guided by a semi-structured interview schedule using open-ended questions. The audio-recorded focus group was transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Five themes represented the perceived barriers and enablers: i) pool water testing methods; ii) resources and training for EHPs; iii) knowledge and behaviour of aquatic facility operators and swimming pool users; iv) regulation; and v) aquatic facility and swimming pool design. Two key barriers within these themes included aquatic facility regulation and unhealthy swimming behaviours.
CONCLUSIONS: Several barriers and enablers to preventing and controlling Cryptosporidium spp. in aquatic facilities were perceived by EHPs. Suggestions to overcome perceived barriers were also identified. Further research is required to determine the impact of these findings on the incidence of cryptosporidiosis associated with aquatic facilities. Implications for public health: The findings contribute to a greater understanding of the barriers and enablers to Cryptosporidium spp. prevention and control in aquatic facilities, which may improve the effectiveness of current prevention and control strategies.
METHODS: A qualitative, constructivist study with a purposive sample of seven EHPs from Victoria, Australia, was conducted. A focus group discussion was guided by a semi-structured interview schedule using open-ended questions. The audio-recorded focus group was transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Five themes represented the perceived barriers and enablers: i) pool water testing methods; ii) resources and training for EHPs; iii) knowledge and behaviour of aquatic facility operators and swimming pool users; iv) regulation; and v) aquatic facility and swimming pool design. Two key barriers within these themes included aquatic facility regulation and unhealthy swimming behaviours.
CONCLUSIONS: Several barriers and enablers to preventing and controlling Cryptosporidium spp. in aquatic facilities were perceived by EHPs. Suggestions to overcome perceived barriers were also identified. Further research is required to determine the impact of these findings on the incidence of cryptosporidiosis associated with aquatic facilities. Implications for public health: The findings contribute to a greater understanding of the barriers and enablers to Cryptosporidium spp. prevention and control in aquatic facilities, which may improve the effectiveness of current prevention and control strategies.