Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie · 2025
[The transdiagnostic approach of psychological distress in clinical practice].
СтатьяОбзорАннотация на английскомНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Marcelis M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Mental healthcare is undergoing a paradigm shift from traditional disorder-specific diagnostics toward a transdiagnostic framework for conceptualizing psychological distress. This framework facilitates an integrated understanding of underlying mechanisms that cut across conventional diagnostic boundaries.
AIM: To present a clinically applicable model of transdiagnostic clinical reasoning, elucidating its added value in routine practice and delineating its distinctions from disorder-focused approaches.
METHOD: A narrative synthesis of the literature was conducted to integrate current conceptual and empirical insights into a pragmatic framework for transdiagnostic case formulation and intervention planning.
RESULTS: Psychopathological presentations frequently co-occur, reflecting shared etiological and maintaining mechanisms that may be biological, psychological, and contextual in origin. A set of functional process domains is delineated to illustrate the clinical utility of a holistic formulation framework in the assessment and treatment of complex, comorbid presentations. The model emphasizes the centrality of relational co-creation—collaborative engagement between service users, significant others, and mental health professionals—as a vehicle for tailored, person-centred care.
CONCLUSION: Transdiagnostic clinical reasoning can be readily applied in current clinical practice. By focusing on underlying processes from a cross-diagnostic perspective, it enables a more integrative, mechanism-oriented, and individualized response to psychological distress, capturing its inherent complexity and heterogeneity.
AIM: To present a clinically applicable model of transdiagnostic clinical reasoning, elucidating its added value in routine practice and delineating its distinctions from disorder-focused approaches.
METHOD: A narrative synthesis of the literature was conducted to integrate current conceptual and empirical insights into a pragmatic framework for transdiagnostic case formulation and intervention planning.
RESULTS: Psychopathological presentations frequently co-occur, reflecting shared etiological and maintaining mechanisms that may be biological, psychological, and contextual in origin. A set of functional process domains is delineated to illustrate the clinical utility of a holistic formulation framework in the assessment and treatment of complex, comorbid presentations. The model emphasizes the centrality of relational co-creation—collaborative engagement between service users, significant others, and mental health professionals—as a vehicle for tailored, person-centred care.
CONCLUSION: Transdiagnostic clinical reasoning can be readily applied in current clinical practice. By focusing on underlying processes from a cross-diagnostic perspective, it enables a more integrative, mechanism-oriented, and individualized response to psychological distress, capturing its inherent complexity and heterogeneity.