MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.116062

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2025

Induction therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors versus upfront ipilimumab/nivolumab in poor prognostic advanced melanoma.

Bloem M, van den Eertwegh A J M, Haanen J B A G, Aarts M J B, van den Berkmortel F W P J, Blank C U, Blokx W A M, Boers-Sonderen M J, Boreel C D M, de Groot J W B, Hospers G A P, Kapiteijn E, Piersma D, Rikhof B, Simkens L H J, Stevense-den Boer A M, van der Veldt A A M, Wouters M W J M, Suijkerbuijk K P M

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: BRAF/MEK inhibitor induction therapy (BRAF/MEK-i) followed by ipilimumab/nivolumab (IPI/NIVO) did not show benefit over upfront IPI/NIVO in unselected advanced melanoma patients in clinical trial setting. We investigated BRAF/MEK-i in subgroups of patients with advanced melanoma and poor prognostic characteristics.

METHODS

Patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (<120 days) followed by planned switch to IPI/NIVO or upfront IPI/NIVO between 2016 and 2023 were included from the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in propensity score-matched cohorts and subgroups (LDH 250-500 and >500U/L, symptomatic and asymptomatic brain metastases (BMs), liver metastases, ≥ 3 metastatic sites, and ECOG PS ≥ 2).

RESULTS

We included 709 patients (187 BRAF/MEK-i and 522 upfront IPI/NIVO). In the matched cohort (n = 280), median PFS and OS were not statistically significantly different: 6.5 (95 %CI 5.3-8.1) and 20.0 (95 %CI 17.2-35.3) months for BRAF/MEK-i vs. 6.6 (95 %CI 4.3-11.3) and 54.0 (95 %CI 21.7-64.4) months for upfront IPI/NIVO. Upfront IPI/NIVO showed significantly improved PFS compared to BRAF/MEK-i for asymptomatic BMs (median 9.4 months (95 %CI 6.3-28.2) vs. 4.8 months (95 %CI 4.1-5.3); p < 0.01), and significantly improved OS for asymptomatic BMs (median 60.4 months (95 %CI 39.1-NR) vs. 16.2 months (95 %CI 11.7-31.8); p < 0.01), liver metastases (median 49.8 months (95 %CI 32.1-60.3) vs. 14.1 months (95 %CI 12.1-20.5); p < 0.01), LDH 250-500 U/L (median 52.7 months (95 %CI 35.1-NR) vs. 20.1 months (95 %CI 13.9-35.5); p = 0.03), and ≥ 3 metastatic sites (median 54.0 months (95 %CI 39.1-NR) vs. 16.7 months (95 %CI 13.8-24.8); p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

BRAF/MEK-i showed no significant benefit over upfront IPI/NIVO in matched and stratified analyses according to prognostic characteristics.

Для цитирования: Bloem M, van den Eertwegh A J M, Haanen J B A G, Aarts M J B, van den Berkmortel F W P J, Blank C U, Blokx W A M, Boers-Sonderen M J, Boreel C D M, de Groot J W B, Hospers G A P, Kapiteijn E, Piersma D, Rikhof B, Simkens L H J, Stevense-den Boer A M, van der Veldt A A M, Wouters M W J M, Suijkerbuijk K P M. Induction therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors versus upfront ipilimumab/nivolumab in poor prognostic advanced melanoma.. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.116062.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.