Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2025
Variations in hepatic circulation: a study of 500 abdominal computed tomography scans.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Biz Maria Eduarda Zen, Salame Jéssica Paola, Correia Gustavo Gumz, Moreira Rafael Saviolo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the vascular anatomy of the liver and other abdominal organs helps surgeons improve preoperative planning, achieve greater surgical success, prevent complications, and reduce morbidity and mortality.
OBJECTIVES: To report the prevalence of anatomical variation in the proper hepatic artery and portal vein observed through computed tomography.
METHODS: This retrospective study was based on 500 3-phase abdominal computed tomography scans. Variations in arterial anatomy were classified according to the Michels system (1966), while those in regarding portal vein anatomy were classified according to the Cheng system (1996).
RESULTS: A total of 31.2% of the cases showed variations in arterial vascularization, the most prevalent being type V (8.2%). No participants were identified with type X, and 0.4% could not be classified. A total of 21.8% showed variation in venous vascularization, with type IV being the most prevalent (8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Medical knowledge of these variations and their prevalence is fundamental for the correct surgical management of upper abdomen pathologies and lower rates of postoperative complications. Variations not classified by previous trials should be categorized according to their clinical importance, and new studies should clarify national population patterns to reduce mortality rates from surgical procedures that involve these vessels.
OBJECTIVES: To report the prevalence of anatomical variation in the proper hepatic artery and portal vein observed through computed tomography.
METHODS: This retrospective study was based on 500 3-phase abdominal computed tomography scans. Variations in arterial anatomy were classified according to the Michels system (1966), while those in regarding portal vein anatomy were classified according to the Cheng system (1996).
RESULTS: A total of 31.2% of the cases showed variations in arterial vascularization, the most prevalent being type V (8.2%). No participants were identified with type X, and 0.4% could not be classified. A total of 21.8% showed variation in venous vascularization, with type IV being the most prevalent (8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Medical knowledge of these variations and their prevalence is fundamental for the correct surgical management of upper abdomen pathologies and lower rates of postoperative complications. Variations not classified by previous trials should be categorized according to their clinical importance, and new studies should clarify national population patterns to reduce mortality rates from surgical procedures that involve these vessels.