High Prevalence of Anorectal Dysfunction in Ambulatory Patients with Chronic Constipation, Regardless of Colon Transit Time.

BACKGROUND

Classification of chronic constipation (CC) into its three subtypes of slow transit constipation, defecation disorder and normal transit constipation, may improve its multifaceted management. We assessed the merits of the London classification in patients with CC, who were studied by both wireless motility capsule (WMC) and high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM), examining their relative utilities in decision-making.s PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Retrospective, community-based study of prospectively collected data on patients with CC by Rome IV criteria, who underwent WMC and HR-ARM, Balloon Expulsion Test, and Rectal Sensory Testing. Clinical assessment was made by standard questionnaires. On WMC, standard criteria for colonic transit time (CTT) were used (normal CTT < 59 h). The hierarchical London classification was used for HR-ARM analyses.

RESULTS

Of 1261 patients with CC, 166 (91 M; ages 22-86) received technically satisfactory WMC and HR-ARM, formed the analyzed study cohort, of whom 84 had normal CTT and 82 had prolonged CTT (> 59 h). Patients with slow CTT were significantly older and had longer duration and more severe disease. Using the London classification criteria for disorders of anorectal function, we noted a high prevalence of anorectal dysfunction, regardless of CTT. Except for lower rate of anal hypertonicity in patients with slow CTT, disorders of recto-anal coordination, and rectal sensation were seen at a comparable rate in patients with CC, regardless of CTT.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant overlap of anorectal disorders in patients with slow CTT. There is questionable specificity and utility of WMC and HR-ARM in assessing patients with CC. More work is needed to demonstrate the value of these studies as surrogate markers of the disease and its response to multifaceted therapy.