International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2016
Efficacy of harmonic focus scalpel in seroma prevention after axillary clearance.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Selvendran Selwyn, Cheluvappa Rajkumar, Tr Ng Vinh Khiêm, Yarrow Simon, Pang Tony C, Segara Davendra, Soon Patsy
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Seroma formation in breast cancer patients who have undergone axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is a source of significant discomfort and morbidity. We aimed to ascertain seroma incidence after ALND, when Harmonic Focus (HF) scalpel is used for dissection instead of conventional diathermy (CD).
METHODS(AND PATIENTS): This retrospective study was carried out in a single hospital over 6 years. Patients were allocated into HF group (HFG) or CD group (CDG). Seroma volume, hospital stay, and complications were evaluated.
RESULTS: Of 94 patients, 42 were in the HFG and 52 in the CDG. Two day median seroma volume was 205 ml (IQR 95-265) for HF, and 227.5 ml (IQR 149-385) for CD. The total median seroma output was 270 ml (IQR 160-478) for HF, and 385 ml (IQR 220-558) for CD. No statistically significant differences between HFG and CDG were identified in these data, as well as patient demographics, operative time, and complication rates. Duration of surgery >2.5 h increased seroma formation (p < 0.001). Mastectomy and ALND increased seroma formation compared to wide local excision (WLE) and ALND (p < 0.05). Nodal involvement, number of lymph nodes resected, and extra nodal spread did not influence seroma formation.
DISCUSSION(AND CONCLUSION): In our hands, HF use was not superior to CD in limiting seroma formation in ALND for breast cancer. Increased seroma formation in surgeries >2.5 h in duration is commensurate with surgeries involving mastectomy and ALND (>2.5 h in our study), which entails greater and sustained tissue and lymphovascular trauma.
METHODS(AND PATIENTS): This retrospective study was carried out in a single hospital over 6 years. Patients were allocated into HF group (HFG) or CD group (CDG). Seroma volume, hospital stay, and complications were evaluated.
RESULTS: Of 94 patients, 42 were in the HFG and 52 in the CDG. Two day median seroma volume was 205 ml (IQR 95-265) for HF, and 227.5 ml (IQR 149-385) for CD. The total median seroma output was 270 ml (IQR 160-478) for HF, and 385 ml (IQR 220-558) for CD. No statistically significant differences between HFG and CDG were identified in these data, as well as patient demographics, operative time, and complication rates. Duration of surgery >2.5 h increased seroma formation (p < 0.001). Mastectomy and ALND increased seroma formation compared to wide local excision (WLE) and ALND (p < 0.05). Nodal involvement, number of lymph nodes resected, and extra nodal spread did not influence seroma formation.
DISCUSSION(AND CONCLUSION): In our hands, HF use was not superior to CD in limiting seroma formation in ALND for breast cancer. Increased seroma formation in surgeries >2.5 h in duration is commensurate with surgeries involving mastectomy and ALND (>2.5 h in our study), which entails greater and sustained tissue and lymphovascular trauma.