MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy · 2014

[Sentinel lymph node biopsy in male breast cancer - a case report].

Nishi Takashi, Nishimura Akimasa, Morohashi Satoko, Hakamada Kenichi

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We report a case of breast cancer in a man who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The patient, a 66-year-old man, observed a tumor under his left areola. The elastic hard tumor had a clear border. Ultrasonography revealed a hypoechoic tumor, approximately 18 mm in diameter, in the left subareolar and outer upper region. On fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), the tumor was diagnosed as a ductal carcinoma. The patient underwent a mastectomy (Bt) and an axillaryly mph node dissection(Ax)after the SLNB. The SLNB was performed with the blue dye alone. Based on histopathological observations, estrogen receptor (ER)- and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive invasive micropapillary carcinoma was diagnosed. The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2) score was 1+, and Ki-67 labeling index was 30%. Lymph node metastasis was not seen in SLNB (0/1) and Ax (0/13). Postoperatively, the patient received oral tamoxifen therapy. There was no evidence of recurrence during the 9-month follow-up. In this case, computed tomographic (CT) lymphography (CTLG) and SLNB were performed successfully, without incident. We recommend SLNB in cases of male breast cancer with clinically negative nodes.

Для цитирования: Nishi Takashi, Nishimura Akimasa, Morohashi Satoko, Hakamada Kenichi. [Sentinel lymph node biopsy in male breast cancer - a case report].. Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy. 2014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.