Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2015
Analysis of pain in the rabbit temporomandibular joint after unilateral splint placement.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Henderson Sarah E, Tudares Mauro A, Gold Michael S, Almarza Alejandro J
Аннотация
AIMS: To determine whether behavioral, anatomical, and physiologic endpoints widely used to infer the presence of pain in rodent models of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) were applicable to the rabbit model of TMD associated with altered joint loading.
METHODS: Unilateral molar dental splints were used to alter temporomandibular joint (TMJ) loading. Changes in nociceptive threshold were assessed with a mechanical probing of the TMJ region on nine splinted and three control rabbits. Fos-like immunoreacitivty in the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis was assessed with standard immunohistochemical techniques from three splinted and six control animals. Retrogradely labeled TMJ afferents were studied with patch-clamp electrophysiologic techniques from three splinted and three control animals. Remodeling of TMJ condyles was assessed by histologic investigations of three splinted and three control animals. A Student t test or a Mann-Whitney U test was used with significance set at P < .05 to compare splinted to control samples.
RESULTS: While variable, there was an increase in mechanical sensitivity in splinted rabbits relative to controls. The increase in Fos+ cells in splinted rabbits was also significant relative to naïve controls (86 ± 8 vs 64 ± 15 cells/section, P < .05). The rheobase (364 ± 80 pA) and action potential threshold (-31.2 ± 2.0 mV) were higher in TMJ afferents from splinted rabbits compared to controls (99 ± 22 pA and -38.0 ± 2.0 mV, P < .05). There was significant remodeling in the condylar fibrocartilage layers as manifested by a change in glycosaminoglycan distribution and a loss of defined cell layers.
CONCLUSION: Behavioral and anatomical results were consistent with an increase in nociceptive signaling in concert with condylar remodeling driven by altered TMJ loading. Changes in excitability and action potential waveform were consistent with possible compensatory changes of TMJ afferents for an overall increase in afferent drive associated with joint degeneration. These compensatory changes may reflect pain-adaption processes that many patients with TMJ disorders experience.
METHODS: Unilateral molar dental splints were used to alter temporomandibular joint (TMJ) loading. Changes in nociceptive threshold were assessed with a mechanical probing of the TMJ region on nine splinted and three control rabbits. Fos-like immunoreacitivty in the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis was assessed with standard immunohistochemical techniques from three splinted and six control animals. Retrogradely labeled TMJ afferents were studied with patch-clamp electrophysiologic techniques from three splinted and three control animals. Remodeling of TMJ condyles was assessed by histologic investigations of three splinted and three control animals. A Student t test or a Mann-Whitney U test was used with significance set at P < .05 to compare splinted to control samples.
RESULTS: While variable, there was an increase in mechanical sensitivity in splinted rabbits relative to controls. The increase in Fos+ cells in splinted rabbits was also significant relative to naïve controls (86 ± 8 vs 64 ± 15 cells/section, P < .05). The rheobase (364 ± 80 pA) and action potential threshold (-31.2 ± 2.0 mV) were higher in TMJ afferents from splinted rabbits compared to controls (99 ± 22 pA and -38.0 ± 2.0 mV, P < .05). There was significant remodeling in the condylar fibrocartilage layers as manifested by a change in glycosaminoglycan distribution and a loss of defined cell layers.
CONCLUSION: Behavioral and anatomical results were consistent with an increase in nociceptive signaling in concert with condylar remodeling driven by altered TMJ loading. Changes in excitability and action potential waveform were consistent with possible compensatory changes of TMJ afferents for an overall increase in afferent drive associated with joint degeneration. These compensatory changes may reflect pain-adaption processes that many patients with TMJ disorders experience.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Action PotentialsAnimalsBone ResorptionBrain StemCartilage, ArticularDisease Models, AnimalFacial PainFemaleGlycosaminoglycansMalocclusionMandibular CondyleNeurons, AfferentNociceptionPain ThresholdPatch-Clamp TechniquesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosRabbitsSplintsStress, MechanicalTemporomandibular JointTemporomandibular Joint DisordersTrigeminal Caudal NucleusTrigeminal Ganglion