MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.005

Медицинская библиотека · Urology · 2011

Paclitaxel+BEP (T-BEP) regimen as induction chemotherapy in poor prognosis patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: a phase II study.

Tryakin A, Fedyanin M, Kanagavel D, Fainstein I, Sergeev J, Polockij B, Matveev V, Zakharova T, Garin A, Tjulandin S

Клиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate paclitaxel, bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (T-BEP) in patients with poor-prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT). Paclitaxel is an active treatment of nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.

METHODS

The present study was an open-label, single-center, Phase II study. Chemotherapy-naive patients received T-BEP (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 [day 2], cisplatin 20 mg/m2 [days 1-5], etoposide 100 mg/m2 [days 1-5], bleomycin 30 IU [days 1, 3, and 5]), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 300 μg (days 6-10). The number of cycles (range 4-6) was dependent on the normalization of tumor markers. Secondary resection was planned for patients with tumor marker-negative partial remission. Assessments included radiologic response, tumor markers, and safety. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) 1 year after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 51 patients, 49 completed chemotherapy and were evaluable for response: 12 (25%) had a complete response, 29 (59%) were marker-negative (tumor marker normalization) and 3 (6%) were marker-positive (tumor marker decrease for ≥1 month) incomplete responders, and 5 (10%) had progressive disease. A total of 37 patients underwent secondary resection. After the treatment of 27 patients, an unplanned analysis showed inappropriate toxicity at cycle 1 (grade 3-4 infection [6 patients] resulting in 2 toxic deaths), which led to treatment modification (BEP [cycle 1], T-BEP [subsequent cycles]), with no further toxic deaths observed. Grade 3-4 adverse events included neutropenia (71%), febrile neutropenia (33%), and infection (14%). During the first year after chemotherapy, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 21 patients relapsed. The PFS rate at 1 year after chemotherapy was 58% (29 of 50 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

T-BEP did not improve PFS in patients with poor-prognosis NSGCT. The administration of T-BEP from cycle 1 resulted in excessive toxicity but was administered safely from cycle 2.

Для цитирования: Tryakin A, Fedyanin M, Kanagavel D, Fainstein I, Sergeev J, Polockij B, Matveev V, Zakharova T, Garin A, Tjulandin S. Paclitaxel+BEP (T-BEP) regimen as induction chemotherapy in poor prognosis patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: a phase II study.. Urology. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.