MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.032

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2020

A review of general surgery resident experience in common bile duct exploration in the ERCP era.

Warner Rachel L, Coleman K Conley, Musgrove Kelsey A, Bardes James M, Borgstrom David C, Grabo Daniel J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Use of minimally invasive techniques for management of common bile duct (CBD) stones has led to declining number of CBD explorations (CBDE) performed at teaching and non-teaching institutions. We evaluate the impact of this decline on surgery training in bile duct procedures.

STUDY

DESIGN

National operative data for general surgery residents (GSR) were examined from 2000 to 2018. Biliary operations including, cholecystectomy open and laparoscopic, and CBDE open and laparoscopic were evaluated for mean number of cases per graduating GSR.

RESULTS

Despite increases in number of GSR, case numbers for laparoscopic cholecystectomy increased 39% from 84 to 117, p < .00001, per GSR. Mean number of cases for open CBDE, however, decreased 74% from 2.7 to 0.7, p < .00001, per GSR and laparoscopic CBDE declined 22% from 0.9 to 0.7 per resident.

CONCLUSION

GSR operative case volume in CBDE has declined significantly creating a training deficiency for this complex skill. Novel simulation, including fresh cadavers, may offer the best option with high-fidelity, dynamic training to mitigate the loss of low volume, high acuity procedures.

Для цитирования: Warner Rachel L, Coleman K Conley, Musgrove Kelsey A, Bardes James M, Borgstrom David C, Grabo Daniel J. A review of general surgery resident experience in common bile duct exploration in the ERCP era.. American journal of surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.032.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.