Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2013
Multicenter study with a direct acoustic cochlear implant.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lenarz Thomas, Zwartenkot Joost W, Stieger Christof, Schwab Burkard, Mylanus Emmanuel A M, Caversaccio Marco, Kompis Martin, Snik Ad F M, D'hondt Christiane, Mojallal Hamidreza
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To confirm the clinical efficacy and safety of a direct acoustic cochlear implant.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study.
SETTING: The study was performed at 3 university hospitals in Europe (Germany, The Netherlands, and Switzerland).
PATIENTS: Fifteen patients with severe-to-profound mixed hearing loss because of otosclerosis or previous failed stapes surgery.
INTERVENTION: Implantation with a Codacs direct acoustic cochlear implant investigational device (ID) combined with a stapedotomy with a conventional stapes prosthesis
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative (3 months after activation of the investigational direct acoustic cochlear implant) audiometric evaluation measuring conventional pure tone and speech audiometry, tympanometry, aided thresholds in sound field and hearing difficulty by the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit questionnaire.
RESULTS: The preoperative and postoperative air and bone conduction thresholds did not change significantly by the implantation with the investigational Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant. The mean sound field thresholds (0.25-8 kHz) improved significantly by 48 dB. The word recognition scores (WRS) at 50, 65, and 80 dB SPL improved significantly by 30.4%, 75%, and 78.2%, respectively, after implantation with the investigational direct acoustic cochlear implant compared with the preoperative unaided condition. The difficulty in hearing, measured by the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, decreased by 27% after implantation with the investigational direct acoustic cochlear implant.
CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate-to-severe mixed hearing loss because of otosclerosis can benefit substantially using the Codacs investigational device.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study.
SETTING: The study was performed at 3 university hospitals in Europe (Germany, The Netherlands, and Switzerland).
PATIENTS: Fifteen patients with severe-to-profound mixed hearing loss because of otosclerosis or previous failed stapes surgery.
INTERVENTION: Implantation with a Codacs direct acoustic cochlear implant investigational device (ID) combined with a stapedotomy with a conventional stapes prosthesis
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative (3 months after activation of the investigational direct acoustic cochlear implant) audiometric evaluation measuring conventional pure tone and speech audiometry, tympanometry, aided thresholds in sound field and hearing difficulty by the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit questionnaire.
RESULTS: The preoperative and postoperative air and bone conduction thresholds did not change significantly by the implantation with the investigational Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant. The mean sound field thresholds (0.25-8 kHz) improved significantly by 48 dB. The word recognition scores (WRS) at 50, 65, and 80 dB SPL improved significantly by 30.4%, 75%, and 78.2%, respectively, after implantation with the investigational direct acoustic cochlear implant compared with the preoperative unaided condition. The difficulty in hearing, measured by the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, decreased by 27% after implantation with the investigational direct acoustic cochlear implant.
CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate-to-severe mixed hearing loss because of otosclerosis can benefit substantially using the Codacs investigational device.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acoustic Impedance TestsAgedAudiometryAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory ThresholdBone ConductionCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsFemaleHearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-SensorineuralHumansMaleMiddle AgedOtologic Surgical ProceduresProspective StudiesSoftwareSpeech PerceptionStapes SurgeryTreatment Outcome