MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery · 2013

[Intracranial inflammatory pseudotumor resected after transcatheter embolization: a case report].

Watanabe Saiko, Tosaka Masahiko, Miyata Takahiro, Sayama Setsuko, Sakamoto Kazuya, Yodonawa Masahiko, Kunimine Hideo, Fujii Takashi, Nakazato Yoichi

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A 63-year-old man presented with an exceptionally rare case of intracranial inflammatory pseudotumor manifesting as speech and gait disturbance. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a left convexity mass with significant peritumoral edema. The mass was attached to the convexity dura and mimicked meningioma. Angiography showed tumor staining, so the tumor was embolized using a gelatin sponge by an intravascular technique. The elastic hard tumor was totally resected without much bleeding. Histological examination showed proliferation of spindle cells and capillaries with nonspecific infiltrate of inflammatory cells consisting of plasma cells, eosinophil granulocytes, lymphocytes, and macrophages. The spindle cells were immunopositive for vimentin. The plasma cells were immunopositive for CD138, epithelial membrane antigen, and IgG. Only a small number of IgG4-positive cells were observed. The diagnosis was consistent with inflammatory pseudotumor. This disease entity, the histological differential diagnosis, its subtypes, and preoperative embolization are discussed.

Для цитирования: Watanabe Saiko, Tosaka Masahiko, Miyata Takahiro, Sayama Setsuko, Sakamoto Kazuya, Yodonawa Masahiko, Kunimine Hideo, Fujii Takashi, Nakazato Yoichi. [Intracranial inflammatory pseudotumor resected after transcatheter embolization: a case report].. No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery. 2013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.