MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13756-024-01481-7

Медицинская библиотека · Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2024

Antimicrobial surface coating in the emergency department as protective technology for infection control (ASEPTIC): a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Cheng Lenard, Low Shun Yee, Boon Yuru, Goh Carmen, Ng Abigail, Ng Alexander Jet Yue, Teo Joshua, Johari Nur Humaira, Pua Yong Hao, Chua Mui Teng, Kuan Win Sen

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

We examined the effectiveness of an antimicrobial surface coating for continual disinfection of high touch-frequency surfaces in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Following a preliminary observation identifying stretcher rails as the surface with highest touch-frequency in the ED, we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial involving 96 stretcher rails. The stretchers were randomized to receive an antimicrobial surface coating or placebo coating. Routine cleaning of stretchers subsequently continued as per hospital protocol in both arms. Sampling for total aerobic, gram-positive halophilic, gram-negative and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteria was performed pre- and post-treatment at 24 h, 7 days and 180 days. Individuals who applied the coating and outcome assessors were blinded to the allocated arms. The primary outcome is contamination of antimicrobial versus placebo rails measured as colony forming units per cm2(CFU/cm2).

RESULTS

Baseline total aerobic bacteria was comparable between placebo and intervention arms (0.84 versus 1.32 CFU/cm2, P = 0.235). Total aerobic bacteria contamination was significantly lower on antimicrobial versus placebo rails at 24 h (0.61 versus 1.01 CFU/cm2, median difference 0.40 CFU/cm2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01 to 1.01 CFU/cm2). There was a non-statistically significant tendency for contamination to be lower on antimicrobial versus placebo rails at 7 days (1.15 versus 1.50 CFU/cm2, median difference 0.35 CFU/cm2, 95% CI -0.64 to 1.28 CFU/cm2), but higher at 180 days (2.06 versus 1.84 CFU/cm2, median difference - 0.22 CFU/cm2, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.78 CFU/cm2).

CONCLUSION

This is the first double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to evaluate an antimicrobial surface coating on high touch-frequency surfaces in the emergency department. Total aerobic bacteria found on antimicrobial-coated patient transport stretcher rails was significantly lower than placebo rails at 24 h.

Для цитирования: Cheng Lenard, Low Shun Yee, Boon Yuru, Goh Carmen, Ng Abigail, Ng Alexander Jet Yue, Teo Joshua, Johari Nur Humaira, Pua Yong Hao, Chua Mui Teng, Kuan Win Sen. Antimicrobial surface coating in the emergency department as protective technology for infection control (ASEPTIC): a pilot randomized controlled trial.. Antimicrobial resistance and infection control. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01481-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.