MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/01616412.2022.2138038

Медицинская библиотека · Neurological research · 2022

Neuralgic amyotrophy detected by magnetic resonance neurography: subclinical, bilateral, and multifocal brachial plexus involvement.

Cejas Claudia, Pastor Rueda José M, Hernández Pinzón Jairo, Stefanoff Nadia, Barroso Fabio

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA) is a painful non-traumatic peripheral nervous system condition affecting the brachial plexus. Signal abnormalities in nerves and muscles have been detected in these patients using magnetic resonance neurography (MRN).

METHODS

Electronic medical records and MRN images obtained in a 3 T scanner, in 14 adult patients diagnosed with NA at our Neurological institution (Neuromuscular Disorders Section), between December 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The study was first approved by our Institutional Ethics Committee.

RESULTS

Subclinical, multifocal, and bilateral nerve signal anomalies were recorded in the brachial plexus of these patients. We identified four different types of nerve constriction without entrapment, which we categorized as follows: incomplete focal (type I), complete focal or hourglass (type II), multifocal or string of pearls (type III) and segmental (type IV).

CONCLUSIONS

Given that MRN is an accurate diagnostic tool to detect nerve damage, we believe abnormal findings could improve early detection of NA patients.

Для цитирования: Cejas Claudia, Pastor Rueda José M, Hernández Pinzón Jairo, Stefanoff Nadia, Barroso Fabio. Neuralgic amyotrophy detected by magnetic resonance neurography: subclinical, bilateral, and multifocal brachial plexus involvement.. Neurological research. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2022.2138038.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.