MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215119000434

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2019

Surgeons' preferences and anxiety levels in paediatric adenotonsillectomy: European perspective.

Kilavuz A E, Bayram A A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the preferences of surgeons regarding surgical modalities used for adenotonsillectomy, and determined anxiety levels related to the adenotonsillectomy procedure.

METHODS

A 10-question survey created by the authors was administered to 413 ENT specialists attending the 4th Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, held in October 2017 in Barcelona, Spain.

RESULTS

Cold knife dissection was the preferred surgical modality for both adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy. Most participants reported encountering one to five patients with post-tonsillectomy bleeding throughout their entire career. The mean anxiety levels during surgery and the 10-day post-operative period were 3.39 ± 2.14 and 4.18 ± 2.63, respectively (p < 0.05). There was a significant negative correlation between anxiety level and surgeon's experience (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cold dissection is still the preferred surgical modality for adenotonsillectomy, while both suture ligation and electrocautery are used for haemostasis. Paediatric adenotonsillectomy is likely to generate anxiety in ENT surgeons, and the possibility of secondary post-tonsillectomy bleeding increases the anxiety levels of surgeons in the post-operative period.

Для цитирования: Kilavuz A E, Bayram A A. Surgeons' preferences and anxiety levels in paediatric adenotonsillectomy: European perspective.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2019. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215119000434.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.