Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2019
A Biomechanical Comparison of Six Suture Configurations for Soft Tissue-Based Graft Traction and Fixation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barber F Alan, Howard Michael S, Piccirillo Justin, Spenciner David B
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare 6 different graft fixation techniques to determine the preparation speed, fixation security, biomechanical strength, and resultant tissue trauma.
METHODS: Six different techniques (10 samples each): #2 OrthoCord Krackow stitch, #2 FiberWire Krackow stitch, SpeedTrap, WhipKnot, Loop-in-loop stitch were created in the distal 3 cm of 9 cm bovine flexor tendons. The proximal 3 cm tendon segment was clamped in a testing machine and the distal suture ends secured by pneumatic grips. 3 preload cycles (10N-100N) and 50N static load was followed by 500 cycles (50N-200N) and then loaded to failure. Graft preparation times, 100 and 500 cycle displacement, maximum failure load, stiffness, and failure mode were recorded.
RESULTS: Representative graft preparation times were: OrthoCord Krackow (247s), FiberWire Krackow (401s), FiberLoop (177s), SpeedTrap (42s), WhipKnot (39s), Loop-in-loop (45s). No WhipKnots survived cyclic loading. 100 cycle displacements were: OrthoCord Krackow (11.5 ± 3.9 mm), FiberWire Krackow (8.9 ± 1.2 mm), FiberLoop (14.2 ± 6.1 mm), SpeedTrap (8.8 ± 2.5 mm), Loop-in-loop (10.4 ± 2.9 mm). FiberLoop displaced significantly more than all others (P = .016). Maximum failure loads were: OrthoCord Krackow (364 ± 24N), FiberWire Krackow (375 ± 45N), FiberLoop (413 ± 95N), SpeedTrap (437 ± 65N), WhipKnot (153 ± 42N), Loop-in-loop (329 ± 112N). The most common failure mode was suture breaking. FiberWire containing constructs (Krackow and FiberLoop) shredded or cut through ("cheese wiring") prior to failure in a majority.
CONCLUSIONS: SpeedTrap, WhipKnot and Loop-in-loop were quickest to create (under 1 minute). The Krackow, SpeedTrap, WhipKnot, and Loop-in-Loop did not damage the tendon during cyclic loading. SpeedTrap and Krackow had the least displacement. FiberLoop displaced more than all other groups (P = .016). No WhipKnot completed cyclic loading. The SpeedTrap (437N) and FiberLoop (413N) had the highest ultimate strength.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While the SpeedTrap and FiberLoop are the strongest techniques, the FiberLoop shreds the tendon, displaced the most, and took longer to create. Based on these results, the SpeedTrap demonstrates the best overall performance.
METHODS: Six different techniques (10 samples each): #2 OrthoCord Krackow stitch, #2 FiberWire Krackow stitch, SpeedTrap, WhipKnot, Loop-in-loop stitch were created in the distal 3 cm of 9 cm bovine flexor tendons. The proximal 3 cm tendon segment was clamped in a testing machine and the distal suture ends secured by pneumatic grips. 3 preload cycles (10N-100N) and 50N static load was followed by 500 cycles (50N-200N) and then loaded to failure. Graft preparation times, 100 and 500 cycle displacement, maximum failure load, stiffness, and failure mode were recorded.
RESULTS: Representative graft preparation times were: OrthoCord Krackow (247s), FiberWire Krackow (401s), FiberLoop (177s), SpeedTrap (42s), WhipKnot (39s), Loop-in-loop (45s). No WhipKnots survived cyclic loading. 100 cycle displacements were: OrthoCord Krackow (11.5 ± 3.9 mm), FiberWire Krackow (8.9 ± 1.2 mm), FiberLoop (14.2 ± 6.1 mm), SpeedTrap (8.8 ± 2.5 mm), Loop-in-loop (10.4 ± 2.9 mm). FiberLoop displaced significantly more than all others (P = .016). Maximum failure loads were: OrthoCord Krackow (364 ± 24N), FiberWire Krackow (375 ± 45N), FiberLoop (413 ± 95N), SpeedTrap (437 ± 65N), WhipKnot (153 ± 42N), Loop-in-loop (329 ± 112N). The most common failure mode was suture breaking. FiberWire containing constructs (Krackow and FiberLoop) shredded or cut through ("cheese wiring") prior to failure in a majority.
CONCLUSIONS: SpeedTrap, WhipKnot and Loop-in-loop were quickest to create (under 1 minute). The Krackow, SpeedTrap, WhipKnot, and Loop-in-Loop did not damage the tendon during cyclic loading. SpeedTrap and Krackow had the least displacement. FiberLoop displaced more than all other groups (P = .016). No WhipKnot completed cyclic loading. The SpeedTrap (437N) and FiberLoop (413N) had the highest ultimate strength.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While the SpeedTrap and FiberLoop are the strongest techniques, the FiberLoop shreds the tendon, displaced the most, and took longer to create. Based on these results, the SpeedTrap demonstrates the best overall performance.