MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000006521

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of surgery · 2024

What's Behind it All: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Retrograstric Pancreatic Necrosis Management.

Harrison Jon M, Day Heather, Arnow Katherine, Ngongoni R Fari, Joseph Abel, Aldridge Taylor, Wheeler Kristan J, DeLong Jon C, Bergquist Jay R, Worth Patrick J, Dua Monica M, Friedland Shai, Park Walter, Eldika Samer, Hwang Joo Ha, Visser Brendan C

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of laparoscopic transgastric necrosectomy (LTN) and direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) in the management of retrogastric walled-off necrosis.

BACKGROUND

Surgical and endoscopic transgastric approaches are used to manage retrogastric pancreatic necrosis. Studies comparing these treatment modalities are lacking but would influence contemporary practice patterns.

METHODS

LTN-treated or DEN-treated patients at Stanford University Hospital between 2011 and 2023 were identified. Cohort data included demographics, core pancreatitis care benchmarks, and clinical outcomes (total debridement time, new-onset endocrine, and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency) as well as reintervention, 30-day readmission, complication, and mortality rates. Long-term follow-up was also compared between intervention arms. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the interaction between admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) score and intervention on length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

One hundred six patients (62% LTN and 38% DEN) were identified. Demographic and core pancreatitis benchmark data were similar between cohorts. Thirty-day readmission, complication, and mortality rates for surgical and endoscopic approaches were also similar: 23% versus 25% ( P = 0.98), 42% versus 40% ( P = 0.97), and 3% versus 3% ( P > 0.99). Median LTN total debridement time (minutes) was 131 versus 134 for DEN; however, complete debridement was achieved with only 1 LTN compared with 3 DENs ( P < 0.01). Although not statistically significant, LOS and unplanned intervention rates were less for LTN (8 vs 10 days, P = 0.41 and 6% vs 15%, P = 0.24). Multivariable analysis revealed a significant interaction between APACHE-II scores and LOS for LTN compared with DEN, which translated into a LOS reduction for higher APACHE-II scoring patients ( P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

LTN is a safe and efficient treatment modality for walled-off necrosis, and compared with DEN, can reduce the LOS in high APACHE-II score patients. While additional comparative research between the two intervention types is needed, this study supports the role of a surgical approach in the management of retrogastric pancreatic necrosis.

Для цитирования: Harrison Jon M, Day Heather, Arnow Katherine, Ngongoni R Fari, Joseph Abel, Aldridge Taylor, Wheeler Kristan J, DeLong Jon C, Bergquist Jay R, Worth Patrick J, Dua Monica M, Friedland Shai, Park Walter, Eldika Samer, Hwang Joo Ha, Visser Brendan C. What's Behind it All: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Retrograstric Pancreatic Necrosis Management.. Annals of surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006521.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.