MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.050

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of cardiology · 2015

Impact of Hospital Volume on Outcomes of Lower Extremity Endovascular Interventions (Insights from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample [2006 to 2011]).

Arora Shilpkumar, Panaich Sidakpal S, Patel Nilay, Patel Nileshkumar, Lahewala Sopan, Solanki Shantanu, Patel Parshva, Patel Achint, Manvar Sohilkumar, Savani Chirag, Tripathi Byomesh, Thakkar Badal, Jhamnani Sunny, Singh Vikas, Patel Samir, Patel Jay, Bhimani Ronak, Mohamad Tamam, Remetz Michael S, Curtis Jeptha P, Attaran Ramak R, Grines Cindy, Mena Carlos Ignacio, Cleman Michael, Forrest John, Badheka Apurva O

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Our primary objective was to study postprocedural outcomes and hospitalization costs after peripheral endovascular interventions and the multivariate predictors affecting the outcomes with emphasis on hospital volume. The study cohort was derived from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2006 to 2011). Peripheral endovascular interventions were identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic and procedural codes. Annual institutional volumes were calculated using unique identification numbers and then divided into quartiles. Two-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The primary outcome was inhospital mortality; secondary outcome was a composite of inhospital mortality and postprocedural complications. Amputation rates and hospitalization costs were also assessed. Multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, p value) revealed age (1.46, 1.37 to 1.55, p <0.001), female gender (1.28, 1.12 to 1.46, p <0.001), baseline co-morbidity status as depicted by a greater Charlson co-morbidity index score (≥2: 4.32, 3.45 to 5.40, p <0.001), emergent or urgent admissions(2.48, 2.14 to 2.88, p <0.001), and weekend admissions (1.53, 1.26 to 1.86, p <0.001) to be significant predictors of primary outcome. An increasing hospital volume quartile was independently predictive of improved primary (0.65, 0.52 to 0.82, p <0.001 for the fourth quartile) and secondary (0.85, 0.73 to 0.97, 0.02 for the fourth quartile) outcomes and lower amputation rates (0.52, 0.45 to 0.61, p <0.001). A significant reduction hospitalization costs ($-3,889, -5,318 to -2,459, p <0.001) was also seen in high volume centers. In conclusion, a greater hospital procedural volume is associated with superior outcomes after peripheral endovascular interventions in terms of inhospital mortality, complications, and hospitalization costs.

Для цитирования: Arora Shilpkumar, Panaich Sidakpal S, Patel Nilay, Patel Nileshkumar, Lahewala Sopan, Solanki Shantanu, Patel Parshva, Patel Achint, Manvar Sohilkumar, Savani Chirag, Tripathi Byomesh, Thakkar Badal, Jhamnani Sunny, Singh Vikas, Patel Samir, Patel Jay, Bhimani Ronak, Mohamad Tamam, Remetz Michael S, Curtis Jeptha P, Attaran Ramak R, Grines Cindy, Mena Carlos Ignacio, Cleman Michael, Forrest John, Badheka Apurva O. Impact of Hospital Volume on Outcomes of Lower Extremity Endovascular Interventions (Insights from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample [2006 to 2011]).. The American journal of cardiology. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.050.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.