MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1200/jco.2012.44.7920

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2012

Results of a randomized trial of chlorambucil versus fludarabine for patients with untreated Waldenström macroglobulinemia, marginal zone lymphoma, or lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma.

Leblond Véronique, Johnson Steve, Chevret Sylvie, Copplestone Adrian, Rule Simon, Tournilhac Olivier, Seymour John Francis, Patmore Russell D, Wright David, Morel Pierre, Dilhuydy Marie-Sarah, Willoughby Sara, Dartigeas Caroline, Malphettes Marion, Royer Bruno, Ewings Maeve, Pratt Guy, Lejeune Julie, Nguyen-Khac Florence, Choquet Sylvain, Owen Roger G

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Treatment options for patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and closely related disorders include alkylating agents, purine analogs, and monoclonal antibodies. No large randomized studies have yet been reported comparing any of these approaches.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

The randomized WM1 study (Trial Comparing Chlorambucil to Fludarabine in Patients With Advanced Waldenström Macroglobulinemia) was undertaken in 101 centers in five countries enrolling 414 eligible patients (339 with WM, 37 with non-mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue marginal zone lymphoma, and 38 with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma) who were randomly assigned to receive chlorambucil or fludarabine. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

On the basis of intent-to-treat analysis, the ORR was 47.8% (95% CI, 40.9% to 54.8%) in the fludarabine arm versus 38.6% (95% CI, 32.0% to 45.7%) in the chlorambucil arm (P = .07). With a median follow-up of 36 months (interquartile range, 18 to 58 months), median progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DR) were significantly improved in the fludarabine arm compared with the chlorambucil arm: PFS, 36.3 versus 27.1 months (P = .012) and DR, 38.3 versus 19.9 months (P < .001). In patients with WM, median overall survival (OS) was not reached in the fludarabine arm versus 69.8 months in the chlorambucil arm (95% CI, 61.6 to 79.8 months; P = .014). Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was significantly higher among patients treated with fludarabine (36%) compared with patients treated with chlorambucil (17.8%; P < .001). Second malignancies were significantly more frequent in the chlorambucil arm with 6-year cumulative incidence rate of 20.6% versus 3.7% in the fludarabine arm (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

In the complete intent-to-treat study population, fludarabine significantly improved PFS compared with chlorambucil, and in patients with WM, it improved OS.

Для цитирования: Leblond Véronique, Johnson Steve, Chevret Sylvie, Copplestone Adrian, Rule Simon, Tournilhac Olivier, Seymour John Francis, Patmore Russell D, Wright David, Morel Pierre, Dilhuydy Marie-Sarah, Willoughby Sara, Dartigeas Caroline, Malphettes Marion, Royer Bruno, Ewings Maeve, Pratt Guy, Lejeune Julie, Nguyen-Khac Florence, Choquet Sylvain, Owen Roger G. Results of a randomized trial of chlorambucil versus fludarabine for patients with untreated Waldenström macroglobulinemia, marginal zone lymphoma, or lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2012. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.44.7920.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.