Cancers · 2026
Appearance of Pancreas Predictive of Cancer Presence: Utility of Computed Tomography Volumetry.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kawaji Yuki, Yamao Kentaro, Ashida Reiko, Takenaka Mamoru, Omoto Shunsuke, Wan Ke, Ishihara Tomokazu, Sugihara Yuto, Morishita Hiromu, Nakahata Akiya, Shishimoto Takahiro, Tamura Takashi, Yamashita Yasunobu, Itonaga Masahiro, Kitano Masayuki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic cancer (PC) should be diagnosed in its early stages. Therefore, it is necessary to identify high-risk individuals of PC.
METHODS: Between 2001 and 2017, 1542 PC cases were diagnosed at two tertial care institutions. Of these, 117 cases had undergone abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) 1-10 years before PC diagnosis and were classified as the PC group. Meanwhile, 43,102 cases underwent abdominal CE-CT for close examination of non-pancreatic diseases in the same period, of which 1170 were randomly selected. Of these, 117 cases were matched to the PC group with the propensity score and designated the non-PC group. Pancreatic volumetry was performed using the 3D image analysis system for abdominal CE-CT in both groups and various measurements were compared. In PC group, CE-CT taken 1-10 years before the onset of PC was analyzed.
RESULTS: After propensity score matching, baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. The whole pancreatic volume/body surface area (BSA) (p = 0.014), volume of main pancreatic duct (MPD) plus cystic lesion/BSA (p < 0.001), volume of pancreatic parenchyma/BSA (p = 0.002), ratio of cross-sectional areas (p = 0.033), and MPD diameter/BSA (p < 0.001) significantly differed between the two groups. In subgroup analysis of patients without cystic lesions, the whole pancreatic volume/BSA, volume of MPD/BSA, volume of pancreatic parenchyma/BSA, ratio of cross-sectional areas, and MPD diameter/BSA significantly differed between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic volumetry could identify patients at high risk of PC.
METHODS: Between 2001 and 2017, 1542 PC cases were diagnosed at two tertial care institutions. Of these, 117 cases had undergone abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) 1-10 years before PC diagnosis and were classified as the PC group. Meanwhile, 43,102 cases underwent abdominal CE-CT for close examination of non-pancreatic diseases in the same period, of which 1170 were randomly selected. Of these, 117 cases were matched to the PC group with the propensity score and designated the non-PC group. Pancreatic volumetry was performed using the 3D image analysis system for abdominal CE-CT in both groups and various measurements were compared. In PC group, CE-CT taken 1-10 years before the onset of PC was analyzed.
RESULTS: After propensity score matching, baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. The whole pancreatic volume/body surface area (BSA) (p = 0.014), volume of main pancreatic duct (MPD) plus cystic lesion/BSA (p < 0.001), volume of pancreatic parenchyma/BSA (p = 0.002), ratio of cross-sectional areas (p = 0.033), and MPD diameter/BSA (p < 0.001) significantly differed between the two groups. In subgroup analysis of patients without cystic lesions, the whole pancreatic volume/BSA, volume of MPD/BSA, volume of pancreatic parenchyma/BSA, ratio of cross-sectional areas, and MPD diameter/BSA significantly differed between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic volumetry could identify patients at high risk of PC.