MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12265-019-09926-w

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2019

Irrigated vs. Non-irrigated Catheters in the Ablation of Accessory Pathways.

Siroky Gregory P, Hazari Meruka, Younan Zyad, Patel Archana, Balog Joshua, Rudnick Andrew, Kassotis John, Kostis William J, Coromilas James, Saluja Deepak

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

There is a paucity of data comparing irrigated to non-irrigated catheters in the ablation of accessory pathways (AP) in adult patients. Retrospective analysis of first-time AP ablations performed at our institution from May 2010 to June 2017. A total of 69 AP ablations were studied; irrigated catheters were used in 78.3% cases. Mean age was 40.9 ± 14.3 years and 56.7% were male. Among APs, 63.8% were left sided and 56.5% were concealed. The total procedure time was 232.0 ± 89.0 min, ablation time was 3.1 ± 5.1 min, and fluoroscopy time was 13.9 ± 15.4 min. The overall acute success rate of ablation was 62/69 (89%). Success rates trended higher with irrigated catheters in both groups and were significant for the population as a whole (94.4% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.04). Analyzing the entire cohort, success rates were significantly higher in ablations using irrigated catheters.

Для цитирования: Siroky Gregory P, Hazari Meruka, Younan Zyad, Patel Archana, Balog Joshua, Rudnick Andrew, Kassotis John, Kostis William J, Coromilas James, Saluja Deepak. Irrigated vs. Non-irrigated Catheters in the Ablation of Accessory Pathways.. Journal of cardiovascular translational research. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s12265-019-09926-w.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.