MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3855/jidc.20739

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of infection in developing countries · 2025

Application of the SARIMA-LSTM model to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for Visceral Leishmaniasis.

Han Mengchen, Hao Chongqi, Zhao Zhiyang, Zhang Peijun, Wu Bin, Qiu Lixia

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

This study proposes a combined Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average and Long Short-Term Memory (SARIMA-LSTM) model to enhance the accuracy of evaluating the effectiveness of visceral leishmaniasis prevention and control efforts in Yangquan, China.

METHODOLOGY: Data were obtained from the Yangquan Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. The hybrid model integrates a SARIMA component with a residual-based LSTM neural network.

RESULTS

In the SARIMA-LSTM model, the LSTM component included seven hidden layer nodes, a learning rate of 0.001, 500 training epochs, a batch size of 256, and utilized the Adam optimization algorithm. The SARIMA-LSTM model demonstrated superior performance (MSE = 2.824, MAE = 1.279, RMSE = 1.681). A paired samples t-test revealed a statistically significant difference between predicted and actual case counts (t = -4.058, p < 0.001), indicating that the actual number of cases was lower than predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined SARIMA-LSTM model outperformed the individual SARIMA and LSTM models, suggesting that the implemented interventions were generally effective.

Для цитирования: Han Mengchen, Hao Chongqi, Zhao Zhiyang, Zhang Peijun, Wu Bin, Qiu Lixia. Application of the SARIMA-LSTM model to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for Visceral Leishmaniasis.. Journal of infection in developing countries. 2025. DOI: 10.3855/jidc.20739.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.