DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0288357
Prognostic value of RGS1 and mTOR Immunohistochemical expression in Egyptian multiple myeloma patients; A single center study.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Prognostic factors in plasma cell myeloma were proved to be related to signaling pathways and associated transcription factors. RGS1 and mTOR were known to play an important role in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. The aim of the study was to evaluate the expression and the prognostic value of RGS1 and mTOR and their relation to clinical as well as other diagnostic criteria in multiple myeloma.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
The present study included 44 denovo Myeloma patients, recruited from the Medical Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. Detection of RGS1 and mTOR expression was performed using Immunohistochemical staining on bone marrow biopsy sections.
RESULTS
The median age was 51 years with male to female ratio 1.58:1. There was a positive highly statistically significant correlation between RGS1 and mTOR among all studied cases (p value <0.001). Regarding their prognostic value, there was a highly statistically significant association of the expression levels of RGS1 and mTOR with treatment response (p <0.001). Finally, there was a significant influence of RGS1 and mTOR on overall survival probability (p value <0.001 and <0.002 respectively) with better survival for those having low expression.
CONCLUSION
RGS1 and mTOR were suggested as poor prognostic markers in MM patients, being associated with lower response rate and inferior OS. We recommend considering RGS1 and mTOR as one of the prognostic criteria in different risk stratification and staging classifications. Further trials for RGS1 and mTOR targeting in multiple myeloma are recommended.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.