MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12282-022-01384-8

Медицинская библиотека · Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022

Evaluation of breast cosmetic changes with a computer-software; the breast cancer conservative treatment cosmetic results (BCCT. core) in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery-supplementary analysis of multicenter single-arm confirmatory trial: JCOG0906.

Nozaki Miwako, Kagami Yoshikazu, Takahashi Mitsuhiro, Machida Ryunosuke, Sekino Yuta, Shibata Taro, Ito Yoshinori, Nishimura Yasumasa, Teshima Teruki, Ushijima Hiroki, Nagata Yasushi, Matsumoto Yasuo, Akimoto Tetsuo, Takahashi Kana, Murayama Shigeyuki, Uno Takashi, Tsujino Kayoko, Hamamoto Yasushi, Nakagawa Keiichi, Kodaira Takeshi, Hiraoka Masahiro, Radiation Therapy Study Group, Japan Clinical Oncology Group

Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A good cosmetic outcome has been defined as an important endpoint in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Various evaluation methods have been studied, but the optimal method has yet to be identified. The present supplementary analysis of JCOG0906 focused on comparing evaluation methods for breast cosmetic outcomes following hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HFWBI) to examine whether a computer-software (the Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment cosmetic results [BCCT. core])-based program evaluation (CE) can be used for Asian women in clinical trials of BCT.

METHODS

Of 306 women, 292 underwent institutional evaluation (IE) for breast cosmetic outcomes before (pre) and 3 years after (post) HFWBI using a 4-point scale (excellent/good/fair/poor), and they were evaluated by CE and a central panel evaluation (PE) on the same scale using 292 pairs of pre/post-HFWBI photographs. PE was performed twice by consensus of the same two experts with a 3-year interval. CE was assessed individually by two radiation oncologists, an expert and a non-expert. Intra-observer variability and inter-observer variability were calculated using the kappa (k) and weighted kappa (wk) statistics.

RESULTS

The agreement between the first and second PE using pre/post-HFWBI photographs was moderate (k = 0.60, wk = 0.64. k = 0.53, wk = 0.60). The agreement between the expert and non-expert on CE was substantial (k = 0.72, wk = 0.76. k = 0.72, wk = 0.77). The inter-observer variability of CE was smaller than the intra-observer variability of PE.

CONCLUSION

CE with BCCT. core was considered a reproducible and an appropriate evaluation method for Asian women in clinical trials of BCT, when breast cosmetic changes were compared between pre/post therapy.

Для цитирования: Nozaki Miwako, Kagami Yoshikazu, Takahashi Mitsuhiro, Machida Ryunosuke, Sekino Yuta, Shibata Taro, Ito Yoshinori, Nishimura Yasumasa, Teshima Teruki, Ushijima Hiroki, Nagata Yasushi, Matsumoto Yasuo, Akimoto Tetsuo, Takahashi Kana, Murayama Shigeyuki, Uno Takashi, Tsujino Kayoko, Hamamoto Yasushi, Nakagawa Keiichi, Kodaira Takeshi, Hiraoka Masahiro, Radiation Therapy Study Group, Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Evaluation of breast cosmetic changes with a computer-software; the breast cancer conservative treatment cosmetic results (BCCT. core) in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery-supplementary analysis of multicenter single-arm confirmatory trial: JCOG0906.. Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan). 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01384-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.