MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000538619

Медицинская библиотека · Caries research · 2024

Organization for Caries Research-European Federation of Conservative Dentistry Consensus Report on Clinical Recommendations for Caries Diagnosis Paper II: Caries Lesion Activity and Progression Assessment.

Neuhaus Klaus W, Kühnisch Jan, Banerjee Avijit, Martignon Stefania, Ricketts David, Schwendicke Falk, van der Veen Monique H, Doméjean Sophie, Fontana Margherita, Lussi Adrian, Jablonski-Momeni Anahita, Mendes Fausto Medeiros, Douglas Gail, Schmalz Gottfried, Campus Guglielmo, Aps Johan, Horner Keith, Opdam Niek, Huysmans Marie-Charlotte, Splieth Christian H

СтатьяConsensus StatementПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

This consensus paper provides recommendations for oral health professionals on why and how to assess caries activity and progression with special respect to the site of a lesion.

METHODS

An expert panel was nominated by the executive councils of the European Organization for Caries Research (ORCA) and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry (EFCD). The steering committee built three working groups that were asked to provide recommendations on (1) caries detection and diagnostic methods, (2) caries activity and progression assessment, and (3) obtain individualized caries diagnoses. The experts of work group 2 phrased and agreed on provisional general and specific recommendations on caries lesion activity and progression, based on a review of the current literature. These recommendations were then discussed and refined in a consensus workshop followed by an anonymous Delphi survey to determine the agreement on each recommendation.

RESULTS

The expert panel agreed on general (n = 7) and specific recommendations (n = 6). The specific recommendations cover coronal caries on pits and fissures, smooth surfaces, proximal surfaces, as well as root caries and secondary caries/caries adjacent to restorations and sealants. 3/13 recommendations yielded perfect agreement.

CONCLUSION

The most suitable method for lesion activity assessment is the visual-tactile method. No single clinical characteristic is indicative of lesion activity; instead, lesion activity assessment is based on assessing and weighing several clinical signs. The recall intervals for visual and radiographic examination need to be adjusted to the presence of active caries lesions and recent caries progression rates. Modifications should be based on individual patient characteristics.

Для цитирования: Neuhaus Klaus W, Kühnisch Jan, Banerjee Avijit, Martignon Stefania, Ricketts David, Schwendicke Falk, van der Veen Monique H, Doméjean Sophie, Fontana Margherita, Lussi Adrian, Jablonski-Momeni Anahita, Mendes Fausto Medeiros, Douglas Gail, Schmalz Gottfried, Campus Guglielmo, Aps Johan, Horner Keith, Opdam Niek, Huysmans Marie-Charlotte, Splieth Christian H. Organization for Caries Research-European Federation of Conservative Dentistry Consensus Report on Clinical Recommendations for Caries Diagnosis Paper II: Caries Lesion Activity and Progression Assessment.. Caries research. 2024. DOI: 10.1159/000538619.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.