MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology · 1992

[Rapid aggravation of splenomegaly by administration of erythropoietin in a case of myelodysplastic syndrome].

Sato T, Wakabayashi Y, Sato T, Nishikawa T, Tashiro Y, Chiba S

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In myeloproliferative disorders, aggravation of splenomegaly was reported as an adverse effect of erythropoietin (EPO). Recently, we experienced the adverse effect of EPO in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A 65-year-old male was admitted to our hospital for scrutiny of pancytopenia in July 8, 1991. He was diagnosed as having MDS (refractory anemia: RA). After discharge, daily subcutaneous administration of EPO (3,000U) was started on August 1 because his Hb concentration had decreased to 9.2 g/dl. After the daily dose of EPO was increased up to 6,000U in August 15, left hypochondralgia gradually developed. EPO administration was haltedon August 22. His splenomegaly was aggravated from 2 finger breadths below the left costal margin before EPO administration to 4.5 finger breadths. Bone marrow examination revealed a change to extremely hypercellular marrow from slightly hypocellular marrow before EPO administration. The peripheral blood cell count was not altered. We concluded that he was a rare case of MDS in which aggravation of splenomegaly was observed, probably as a result of extramedullary hematopoiesis induced by administration of EPO.

Для цитирования: Sato T, Wakabayashi Y, Sato T, Nishikawa T, Tashiro Y, Chiba S. [Rapid aggravation of splenomegaly by administration of erythropoietin in a case of myelodysplastic syndrome].. [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology. 1992.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.