MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11864-025-01339-z

Медицинская библиотека · Current treatment options in oncology · 2025

Covalent and Non-Covalent BTK Inhibition in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment.

Shah Pratik V, Gladstone Douglas E

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are transforming chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment. Given the availability of both covalent and non-covalent BTK inhibitors (BTKis) CLL treatment has become more nuanced. Here the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and resistance patterns associated with both inhibitor classes are reviewed to help create a framework for integrating covalent and non-covalent BTKis into CLL treatment algorithms. Our treatment algorithm based on the available data is as follows, in the frontline setting when oral therapy is preferred/chosen and indefinite therapy is not a deterrent, irrespective of DNA and IGVH mutational status, a second-generation covalent BTK inhibitor (cBTKi) is recommended. In the relapsed/refractory setting when oral therapy is preferred a second-generation cBTKi is preferred. For those suffering disease progression during second generation cBTK, it is recommended to change to an alternative cBTKi and for those exposed to greater than two lines of therapy, challenging to a non-covalent BTKi (ncBTKi) in the form of pirtobrutinib. At the time of disease progression on a BTKi, we recommend testing for resistance mutations. Data on combination therapy's role and time-limited BTKi use remain under active investigation.

Для цитирования: Shah Pratik V, Gladstone Douglas E. Covalent and Non-Covalent BTK Inhibition in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment.. Current treatment options in oncology. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-025-01339-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.