MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215123000658

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2023

Repair of posterior laryngeal cleft: a 10-year experience in a tertiary referral hospital.

El-Sobki Ahmed, Baz Hemmat, Ibrahim Reham Ae, El Deeb Mohamed E, El-Kholy Noha Ahmed, Ashraf Bassem, Hashish Menna Ibrahim, Negm Ahmed

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to present experience with surgical treatment of laryngeal cleft cases through both open and endoscopic approaches.

METHOD: A retrospective evaluation of all patients diagnosed as having a laryngeal cleft in a tertiary hospital over 10 years was performed. Pre-operative data, conservative and surgical management of cases, and outcomes were collected, tabulated and analysed.

RESULTS

This study included 43 patients aged from 2 to 44 months with a median of 9.19 months. Concerning management technique, 12 patients had conservative treatment and the remaining 31 underwent a surgical procedure (of them, 20 patients underwent endoscopic intervention and 11 had the open surgical technique). In the open group, we used either tibial periosteum (six cases) or harvested costal cartilage (five cases).

CONCLUSION

Surgical management in the form of endoscopic Coblation-assisted or an open approach is indicated in severe cases or mild cases not responding to conservative management.

Для цитирования: El-Sobki Ahmed, Baz Hemmat, Ibrahim Reham Ae, El Deeb Mohamed E, El-Kholy Noha Ahmed, Ashraf Bassem, Hashish Menna Ibrahim, Negm Ahmed. Repair of posterior laryngeal cleft: a 10-year experience in a tertiary referral hospital.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2023. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215123000658.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.