MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00383-022-05228-6

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric surgery international · 2022

Computational fluid dynamics assessment of congenital tracheal stenosis.

Morita Keiichi, Takeishi Naoki, Wada Shigeo, Hatakeyama Tadashi

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The severity of congenital tracheal stenosis (CTS) is commonly evaluated based on the degree of stenosis. However, it does not always reflect the clinical respiratory status. We applied computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to the assessment of CTS. The aim of this study was to evaluate its validity.

METHODS

CFD models were constructed on 15 patients (12 preoperative models and 15 postoperative models) with CTS before and after surgery, using the computed tomographic data. Energy flux, needed to drive airflow, measured by CFD and the minimum cross-sectional area of the trachea (MCAT) were quantified and evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The energy flux correlated positively with the clinical respiratory status before and after surgery (rs = 0.611, p = 0.035 and rs = 0.591, p = 0.020, respectively). Although MCAT correlated negatively with the clinical respiratory status before surgery (rs = -0.578, p = 0.044), there was not significant correlation between the two after surgery (p = 0.572).

CONCLUSIONS

The energy flux measured by CFD assessment reflects the respiratory status in CTS before and after surgery. CFD can be an additional objective and quantitative evaluation tool for CTS.

Для цитирования: Morita Keiichi, Takeishi Naoki, Wada Shigeo, Hatakeyama Tadashi. Computational fluid dynamics assessment of congenital tracheal stenosis.. Pediatric surgery international. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05228-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.