DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000059360.97108.c4
Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study of 3 intussusception techniques in rats.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Vasoepididymostomy is a technically challenging but cost-effective treatment for obstructive azoospermia. We evaluated the outcomes of 3 intussusception vasoepididymostomy techniques, namely 3 suture triangulation, 2 suture transverse and a new 2 suture longitudinal technique.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Male Wistar rats were randomized into 4 experimental and 1 control groups. After 3 weeks of vasal obstruction bilateral vasoepididymostomy was performed. In group I, 3 sutures were placed in triangular fashion. In group II, 2 sutures were placed perpendicular to the tubule. In group III, 2 sutures were placed longitudinal to the tubule. The tubules were then opened in the direction of the needles and anastomosed to the vasa. After 5 months patency was evaluated in blinded fashion.
RESULTS
The functional patency rate (presence of motile sperm in the vas) was 64%, 64% and 93% in groups I to III, respectively (p <0.001). As evaluated by methylene blue retrograde vasography toward the epididymis, the mechanical patency rate was similar for the 3 techniques, that is 86%, 86% and 93% in groups I to III, respectively. The sperm granuloma rate was significantly lower in group III (36%, 21% and 0% in groups I to III, respectively, p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Transverse 2 suture vasoepididymostomy has a patency rate similar to that of the 3 suture technique. Our new 2 suture longitudinal technique, which allows a larger opening in the epididymal tubule for anastomosis, is superior to the 2 and 3 suture techniques with respect to the patency and sperm granuloma rates.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.