MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/sni.sni_230_18

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology international · 2018

A review of the disagreements in the prevalence and treatment of the tethered cord syndromes with chiari-1 malformations.

Epstein Nancy E

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The tethered cord syndrome (TCS) accompanying Chiari-1 (CM-1) malformations and the occult tethered cord syndrome (OTCS) syndrome accompanying the low lying cerebellar tonsil (LLCT) syndrome may be treated with sectioning of the filum terminale (SFT).

METHODS

Utilizing PubMed, we reviewed the neurosurgical literature to determine how frequently spinal neurosurgeons diagnosed the TCS (e.g., conus terminating below the normal L1-L2 disc level) on lumbar magnetic resonance (MR) studies in patients with CM-1 malformations [e.g. tonsils >5-12 mm below the foramen magnum (FM) warranting SFT]. In addition, we assessed how frequently spinal neurosurgeons encountered the OTCS (e.g., conus normally located at L1-L2 on MR) accompanying the LLCT (e.g., tonsils herniated <5 mm below the FM) also requiring SFT.

RESULTS

According to the neurosurgical literature, the incidence of TCS accompanying CM-1 requiring SFT ranged from 2.2% to < 6%, and up to 14%. Few studies additionally highly correlated the OCTS accompanying the LLCT syndrome warranting SFT.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the differences in the literature, more studies are needed to assess the risks (complications) vs. benefits (improved neurological outcomes) of SFT surgery for TCS with CM-1 and SFT for OCTS with LLCT.

Для цитирования: Epstein Nancy E. A review of the disagreements in the prevalence and treatment of the tethered cord syndromes with chiari-1 malformations.. Surgical neurology international. 2018. DOI: 10.4103/sni.sni_230_18.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.