MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/cid/ciab330

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021

Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 on Self-Collected Saliva or Anterior Nasal Specimens Compared With Healthcare Personnel-Collected Nasopharyngeal Specimens.

Marx Grace E, Biggerstaff Brad J, Nawrocki Courtney C, Totten Sarah E, Travanty Emily A, Burakoff Alexis W, Scott Tracy, De Hey Jesse Chavez-Van, Carlson Jesse J, Wendel Karen A, Harcourt Jennifer L, Tamin Azaibi, Thomas Jennifer D, Rowan Sarah E, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment COVID-19 Laboratory Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Laboratory Response Team

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Nasopharyngeal specimens (NPS) are commonly used for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing but can be uncomfortable for patients. Self-collected saliva specimens (SS) or anterior nasal specimens (ANS) for SARS-CoV-2 detection are less invasive, but the sensitivity of these specimen types has not been thoroughly evaluated.

METHODS

During September-November 2020, 730 adults undergoing SARS-CoV-2 testing at community testing events and homeless shelters in Denver provided self-collected SS and ANS before NPS collection and answered a short survey about symptoms and specimen preference. Specimens were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by means of real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR); viral culture was performed on a subset of specimens positive by rRT-PCR. The sensitivity of SS and ANS for SARS-CoV-2 detection by rRT-PCR was measured against that of NPS. Subgroup analyses included test outcomes by symptom status and culture results.

RESULTS

Sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection by rRT-PCR appeared higher for SS than for ANS (85% vs 80%) and higher among symptomatic participants than among those without symptoms (94% vs 29% for SS; 87% vs 50% for ANS). Among participants with culture-positive SARS-CoV-2 by any specimen type, the sensitivities of SS and ANS by rRT-PCR were 94% and 100%, respectively. SS and ANS were equally preferred by participants; most would undergo NPS collection again despite this method's being the least preferred.

CONCLUSIONS

SS were slightly more sensitive than ANS for SARS-CoV-2 detection with rRT-PCR. With both SS and ANS, SARS-CoV-2 was reliably detected among participants with symptoms. Self-collected SS and ANS offer practical advantages, are preferred by patients, and might be most useful for testing people with coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms.

Для цитирования: Marx Grace E, Biggerstaff Brad J, Nawrocki Courtney C, Totten Sarah E, Travanty Emily A, Burakoff Alexis W, Scott Tracy, De Hey Jesse Chavez-Van, Carlson Jesse J, Wendel Karen A, Harcourt Jennifer L, Tamin Azaibi, Thomas Jennifer D, Rowan Sarah E, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment COVID-19 Laboratory Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Laboratory Response Team. Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 on Self-Collected Saliva or Anterior Nasal Specimens Compared With Healthcare Personnel-Collected Nasopharyngeal Specimens.. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2021. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab330.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.