MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/vaccines9030261

Медицинская библиотека · Vaccines · 2021

Protective Effect of Nasal Colonisation with ∆cps/piaA and ∆cps/proABCStreptococcus pneumoniae Strains against Recolonisation and Invasive Infection.

Ramos-Sevillano Elisa, Ercoli Giuseppe, Guerra-Assunção José Afonso, Felgner Philip, Ramiro de Assis Rafael, Nakajima Rie, Goldblatt David, Tetteh Kevin Kweku Adjei, Heyderman Robert Simon, Gordon Stephen Brian, Ferreria Daniela Mulari, Brown Jeremy Stuart

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

RATIONALE: Nasopharyngeal administration of live virulence-attenuated Streptococcus pneumoniae strains is a potential novel preventative strategy. One target for creating reduced virulence S. pneumoniae strains is the capsule, but loss of the capsule reduces the duration of S. pneumoniae colonisation in mice which could impair protective efficacy against subsequent infection.

OBJECTIVES

To assess protective efficacy of nasopharyngeal administration of unencapsulated S. pneumoniae strains in murine infection models.

METHODS

Strains containing cps locus deletions combined with the S. pneumoniae virulence factors psaA (reduces colonisation) or proABC (no effect on colonisation) were constructed and their virulence phenotypes and ability to prevent recolonisation or invasive infection assessed using mouse infection models. Serological responses to colonisation were compared between strains using ELISAs, immunoblots and 254 S. pneumoniae protein antigen array.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

The ∆cps/piaA and ∆cps/proABC strains were strongly attenuated in virulence in both invasive infection models and had a reduced ability to colonise the nasopharynx. ELISAs, immunoblots and protein arrays showed colonisation with either strain stimulated weaker serological responses than the wild type strain. Mice previously colonised with these strains were protected against septicaemic pneumonia but, unlike mice colonised with the wild type strain, not against S. pneumoniae recolonisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonisation with the ∆cps/piaA and ∆cps/proABC strains prevented subsequent septicaemia, but in contrast, to published data for encapsulated double mutant strains they did not prevent recolonisation with S. pneumoniae. These data suggest targeting the cps locus is a less effective option for creating live attenuated strains that prevent S. pneumoniae infections.

Для цитирования: Ramos-Sevillano Elisa, Ercoli Giuseppe, Guerra-Assunção José Afonso, Felgner Philip, Ramiro de Assis Rafael, Nakajima Rie, Goldblatt David, Tetteh Kevin Kweku Adjei, Heyderman Robert Simon, Gordon Stephen Brian, Ferreria Daniela Mulari, Brown Jeremy Stuart. Protective Effect of Nasal Colonisation with ∆cps/piaA and ∆cps/proABCStreptococcus pneumoniae Strains against Recolonisation and Invasive Infection.. Vaccines. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9030261.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.