MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.10.005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2006

Acoustic analysis findings in objective laryngopharyngeal reflux patients.

Oguz Haldun, Tarhan Erkan, Korkmaz Murat, Yilmaz Ugur, Safak Mustafa A, Demirci Munir, Ozluoglu Levent N

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the effects of objective laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) on the acoustic parameters of patients by comparing their voice samples with that of control subjects.

STUDY

DESIGN

Prospective study in two tertiary reference hospitals.

METHODS

48 consecutive patients with symptoms related to LPR and 64 control subjects were included in the study. Suspected LPR patients underwent a 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring, and 25 (52%) of them were shown to have objective LPR. Acoustical evaluation results of objective LPR patients were compared with that of symptomatic LPR patients and control subjects.

RESULTS

All frequency perturbation values obtained from objective and symptomatic LPR patients were higher than the control subjects (P<0.01). Mean fundamental frequency, amplitude perturbation measures, and noise-to-harmonics ratio were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

LPR patients have significantly different frequency perturbation values than control subjects.

Для цитирования: Oguz Haldun, Tarhan Erkan, Korkmaz Murat, Yilmaz Ugur, Safak Mustafa A, Demirci Munir, Ozluoglu Levent N. Acoustic analysis findings in objective laryngopharyngeal reflux patients.. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.10.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.