[Partial superficial parotidectomy versus superficial parotidectomy for treatment of parotid benign tumors: evidence-based medicine analysis].

Objective

The aim of this study is to systematically assess the postoperative outcomes of partial superficial parotidectomy（PSP） and superficial parotidectomy（SP） by systematic literature review and Meta-analysis, and to provide a theoretical basis for the selection of the appropriate surgical approach in clinical process. Method:Relevant studies that compared the outcomes of PSP and SP for the parotid benign tumors were searched in Pubmed, CNKI and Wanfangdata databases, and Meta-analysis was performed using software RevMan 5.0. Result:24 studies were selected for the Meta-analysis. A total of 2 795 participants were included in those studies, of whom 1 301 underwent PSP and 1 494 underwent SP. The recurrence rates for PSP and SP were 1.14%（10 of 874） and 0.6%（6 of 993）, respectively. There were no statistically significant difference in recurrence rate between PSP and SP. The rates of transient facial nerve paresis for PSP and SP were 11.60%（122 of 1 052） and 27.37%（350 of 1 279）, respectively. The rates of permanent facial nerve paralysis for PSP and SP were 1.04%（6 of 579） and 4.46%（31 of 695）, respectively. The incidences of Frey's syndrome in PSP group and SP group were 9.20%（95 of 1 033） and 30.32%（409 of 1 349）, respectively. The rate of salivary fistulafor PSP and SP were 5.38%（37 of 688） and 11.25%（65 of 578）. PSP could reduce the risk for complications compared with SP.

Conclusion

This systematic review with meta-analysis suggests that PSP has a similar recurrence rate as SP, but PSP can significantly reduce the postoperativecomplications.