MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.23629

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2014

Pilot study: Raman spectroscopy in differentiating premalignant and malignant oral lesions from normal mucosa and benign lesions in humans.

Guze Kevin, Pawluk Hanna C, Short Michael, Zeng Haishan, Lorch Jochen, Norris Charles, Sonis Stephen

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Current practice for differentiating tissue lesions are based on histopathological criteria. This process is subject to error. The purpose of this study was to test whether an alternative, tissue-based molecular signatures Raman spectra could be used to differentiate premalignant and malignant lesions from normal mucosa or benign lesions.

METHODS

Eighteen treatment naive subjects with histologically diagnosed oral disease were studied by comparing the Raman spectra of lesions with contralateral healthy sites. Principle component and multivariate analysis were used to predict which of the tissue groups the average spectrum of each lesion or normal tissue belonged.

RESULTS

The average spectra were clearly different between premalignant and malignant lesions and those derived from normal, benign tissues. Premalignant and malignant lesions could be predicted with 100% sensitivity and 77% specificity.

CONCLUSION

Raman spectroscopy (RS) offers the potential to provide point of care diagnosis of oral disease using a noninvasive, convenient, and relatively inexpensive technology.

Для цитирования: Guze Kevin, Pawluk Hanna C, Short Michael, Zeng Haishan, Lorch Jochen, Norris Charles, Sonis Stephen. Pilot study: Raman spectroscopy in differentiating premalignant and malignant oral lesions from normal mucosa and benign lesions in humans.. Head & neck. 2014. DOI: 10.1002/hed.23629.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.